REPORT
DIGEST


ILLINOIS YOUTH CENTER
WARRENVILLE


COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For the Two Years Ended:
June 30, 1998


Summary of Findings:

Total this audit  4
Total last audit  0
Repeated from last audit 0


Release Date:
April 21, 1999



State of Illinois
Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND
AUDITOR GENERAL

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:
Office of the Auditor General
Attn: Records Manager
Iles Park Plaza
740 E. Ash Street
Springfield, IL 62703
(217) 782-6046 or TDD (217) 524-4646

This Report Digest is also available on
the worldwide web at
http://www.state.il.us/auditor

SYNOPSIS

  • The Center did not properly record accounts payable within locally held funds.
  • The Center did not record an automobile purchase within property records or affix a State property tag to the automobile.
  • The Center did not properly maintain the database used to record and track commodities.
  • The Center did not maintain a current General Ledger from November 1997 through June 30, 1998.

{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the next page.}

 

ILLINOIS YOUTH CENTER - WARRENVILLE
COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 1998

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

  • Total Expenditures (All Appropriated Funds)

Personal Services
% of Total Expenditures
Average No. of Employees
Average Salary Per Employee

Inmate Compensation
% of Total Expenditures

Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement)
% of Total Expenditures

Contractual Services
% of Total Expenditures

All Other Items
% of Total Expenditures

  • Cost of Property and Equipment

$5,859,335

$4,083,331
69.69%
98
$41,667

$31,614
.54%

$516,262
8.81%

$799,235
13.64%

$428,893
7.32%

$5,388,453

$5,433,674

$3,662,726
67.41%
87
$42,100

$26,228
.48%

$454,306
8.36%

$873,524
16.08%

$416,890
7.67%

$5,355,929

$4,905,927

$ 3,026,830
61.70%
84
$36,034

$28,215
.58%

$368,675
7.51%

$817,743
16.67%

$664,464
13.54%

$5,298,111

 

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES

FY 1998

FY 1997

FY 1996

Average Number of Inmates

160

163

141

Ratio of Correctional Officers to Inmates

1/2.67

1/2.96

1/2.47

Cost Per Year Per Inmate

$36,971

$33,880

$34,412

Rated Inmate Capacity

108

108

108

Approximate Square Feet Per Inmate

53

52

60

 

CENTER SUPERINTENDENT
During Audit Period: Glenda M. Blakemore

Currently: Glenda M. Blakemore

 

 











Auditors identified four invoices for services or goods received in FY 98 but paid in FY 99












The Center did not enter an automobile purchase in the property control system nor did staff identify the automobile in an annual observation of property














Audit tests showed receipt of commodities in Fiscal Year 1998 were not recorded in the Department's inventory system until, on average, 21 calendar days after receipt















Because the Center did not properly maintain a General Ledger the Center inaccurately recorded its assets as of June 30, 1998

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

IMPROPER RECORDING OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

The Center did not properly record accounts payable.

The Center did not enter information from vendor invoices into the accounts payable system until the Center was ready to pay the invoices. Thus, accounts payable were never accurately recorded in the system. During testing of unrecorded liabilities we identified four invoices, totaling $1,495, that were for services or goods received in Fiscal Year 1998 but were paid in Fiscal Year 1999.

Generally accepted accounting principles and the Department of Correction's Administrative Directive 2.40.101 require recognition and recording of liabilities in the period in which the services or goods are received. (Finding 98-1, page 11)

We recommended the Center enter invoices into the accounts payable system on a timely basis. Center management agreed with the recommendation and stated that Business Office staff will monitor input efforts to ensure compliance with the recommendation.

PURCHASED AUTOMOBILE NOT RECORDED

The Center did not record an automobile purchase within the Department's property control system.

The Department's Administrative Directive 2.75.104 requires purchased property to be tagged and entered into the Property Control System (PCS). However, Center staff did not initially tag a new automobile or enter the appropriate data into the PCS. In addition, when Center staff conducted their annual observation of property, they did not identify the automobile as an untagged and unlisted item.

Because the Center did not enter the purchase into the system, and did not discover the error in its annual observation of property, the Center's fixed asset reports submitted to the Department's Central Office understated property by $14,900, which was the cost of the automobile. (Finding 98-2, page 12)

We recommended the Center comply with Department administrative directives and properly tag and record purchases of fixed assets. Center management agreed with the recommendation noting that the automobile was subsequently tagged and recorded as a Center fixed asset.

UNTIMELY PROCESSING OF INVENTORY TRANSACTIONS

The Center did not properly maintain a perpetual record of the quantity and dollar value of items in the Center's inventory.

Center staff did not promptly record inventory received or issued out of inventory. Audit tests showed receipt of commodities in Fiscal Year 1998 were not recorded in the Department's inventory system until, on average, 21 calendar days after receipt. Meanwhile, commodities taken out of inventory in Fiscal Year 1998 were not deducted from the inventory system until, on average, 32 days after distribution. In addition, there were similar delays in recording receipt (average time of 18 days) and disbursement (29 days) of inventory in Fiscal Year 1997.

The lack of timely recording of inventory into the Department's computer system reduces the Center's internal control over commodity expenditures as it limits the Center's ability to safeguard and properly order commodities. (Finding 98-3, page 13)

We recommended the Center establish a schedule to timely record inventory transactions into the Department's system. We also recommended the Center train additional personnel to perform this function when responsible staff are absent. Center management accepted the recommendation and noted that staff will be monitored to ensure timely recording of inventory transactions.

LACK OF A GENERAL LEDGER

The Center did not maintain a General Ledger of accounting activities for the period of November 1997 through June 30, 1998.

Department of Correction's Administrative Directive 2.26.104 requires Center accounting staff to update the General Ledger each month. The Center did not perform this update nor did it reconcile its General Ledger with reports submitted to the Department's Central Office or the Comptroller's Office. As a result the Center inaccurately recorded the assets held by the Center as of June 30, 1998. (Finding 98-4, page 15)

We recommended that the Center process, post, and reconcile the General Ledger by the 20th of the subsequent month to allow the accurate filing of reports to the Department's Central Office and the Comptroller's Office. Center management concurred with the recommendation.

AUDITORS' OPINION

We conducted a compliance audit of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our single audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the Department will be presented in the single audit report.



____________________________________
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

WGH:JAW:ak

SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS

Our special assistant auditors for this audit were Duffner & Company, P.C.