REPORT DIGEST NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION AND SINGLE AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 Release Date: March 19, 2020 FINDINGS THIS AUDIT: 20 CATEGORY: NEW -- REPEAT -- TOTAL Category 1: 0 -- 0 -- 0 Category 2: 6 -- 14 -- 20 Category 3: 0 -- 0 -- 0 TOTAL: 6 -- 14 -- 20 FINDINGS LAST AUDIT: 21 Category 1: Findings that are material weaknesses in internal control and/or a qualification on compliance with State laws and regulations (material noncompliance). Category 2: Findings that are significant deficiencies in internal control and noncompliance with State laws and regulations. Category 3: Findings that have no internal control issues but are in noncompliance with State laws and regulations. State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General FRANK J. MAUTINO, AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov INTRODUCTION This digest covers our federal Single Audit and Compliance Examination of Northeastern Illinois University (University) for the year ended June 30, 2019. A separate Financial Audit as of and for the year ended June 30, 2019, was previously released on March 2, 2020. In total, this report contains 20 findings, none of which were reported in the Financial Audit. SYNOPSIS • (19-01) The University did not timely notify students when federal student aid loan funds were credited to students’ accounts. • (19-03) The University did not comply with the internal controls and compliance requirements on allowable cost and costs principles. • (19-04) The University did not communicate required program information to subrecipients of federal awards. • (19-11) The University did not have adequate controls over its property and equipment. • (19-13) The University did not comply with the College Student Immunization Act. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNTIMELY NOTIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENT OF LOAN AND TEACH GRANTS The University did not timely notify the students when federal student aid loan funds were credited to students’ accounts. In testing 33 students who received Federal Direct Student Loans and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (TEACH Grant) during the fiscal year, we noted 25 (76%) students tested, in 46 disbursement transactions, were notified 39 to 49 days after the federal assistance was credited to the students’ accounts. The total direct loan and TEACH Grants disbursed to these students was $180,829. In addition, we noted 1 (3%) student was not notified of the change in their federal loan. (Finding 1, pages 17-18) We recommended the University ensure compliance with the federal regulations regarding student notification. University officials agreed with the finding. WEAKNESSES OVER ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES REQUIREMENTS The University did not comply with the internal controls and compliance requirements on allowable costs and costs principles. During our review of payroll documents for 29 employees, we noted the following: • 14 (48%) employees submitted their time and effort reports 9 to 42 days after the required due date. • Five (17%) employees did not submit timesheets for the period tested. • 16 (55%) employees for pay periods tested were not timely completed and approved by the supervisor or unit head. The timesheets were approved one to 238 days late. In addition, during our testing of 160 vouchers totaling $798,503, we noted the following: • Required signatures on purchase requisitions and travel authorization of 2 (1%) vouchers totaling $3,456 were not obtained. The requisition forms for these vouchers totaling $9,142, were increased, therefore requiring an additional level of approval, which was not obtained. • Required signature of 6 (4%) vouchers totaling $11,607 were not obtained. • A voucher (1%) amounting to $1,100 was charges to an incorrect expenditure category. (Finding 3, pages 21-24) We recommended the University improve its procedures on time and effort reporting to ensure timely submission of the reports and compliance with University policy and Federal regulations. In addition, we recommended the University strengthen its controls over voucher processing to ensure compliance with the University policies and prevent and detect unauthorized transactions timely in compliance with the University policy and Federal regulations. University officials agreed with the finding. FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE REQUIRED INFORMATION TO SUBRECIPIENTS The University did not communicate required program information to subrecipients of federal awards. During our testing of six subrecipients of the Research and Development Cluster, Higher Education Institutional Aid, and 21st Century Community Learning Centers, the University did not communicate the required information to 4 (67%) subrecipients with federal expenditures totaling $131,256 to comply with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award. (Finding 4 pages 25-26) We recommended the University implement uniform procedures across all departments to serve as a guideline in communicating required subaward information to subrecipients. University officials agreed with the finding. INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER UNIVERSITY PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The University did not have adequate controls over its property and equipment. During our physical identification of 20 items from the property records to the item, we noted the following: • One video set (5%) amounting to $1,437 could not be located. The University filed a missing asset investigation report for this item after the auditor’s observation. • One ticket printer (5%) amounting to $1,969 did not have a tag number. • Two (10%) equipment items consisting of a laptop and a television totaling $5,628 were found in a location different from the location indicated in the property records During our tracing of 20 items physically identified to the property records, we noted three (15%) equipment items consisting of a projector, ticket printer, and a laptop totaling $3,487 were found in a location different from the location indicated in the property records. During our testing of 26 vouchers totaling $499,603, we noted the following: • Equipment items purchased consisting of fiber optic transceivers and telecommunication devices from two (8%) vouchers totaling $72,889 were not tagged and were not included in the property records. • Various equipment items purchased, such as music rotary filing cabinets and an HD scaling auto-switcher, totaling $16,839 from two vouchers (8%), were not timely recorded in the property record. These items were recorded 103 and 160 days after the vouchers were paid. During our review of the University annual inventory count certification, we noted the following: • The University did not accurately report the results of its annual inventory count to CMS. The University had no discrepancy reported on its annual inventory certification as of October 2018 submitted in February 2019 to CMS. The University performed the annual inventory count between June 2018 to October 2018. During this timeframe, the University identified 1,887 unlocated items totaling $1,193,524. 1,578 items totaling $830,838 were non-computer items and 309 items totaling $362,686 consisted of computers and laptops. The University prepared and submitted deletion requests for these unlocated items prior to the submission of its annual inventory certification to CMS, allowing the University to report that there were no discrepancies between its records and its annual inventory count. • The University did not have written procedures to properly conduct the entire physical count process including the objective of the count, timing and types of counts, instructions for counting and recording, and researching and adjusting discrepancies, as well as procedures and trainings to new employees to perform the count. (Finding 11, pages 38-40) We recommended the University improve its procedures to ensure property and equipment records are accurately maintained, University assets are properly accounted for, and annual inventory counts are properly conducted and discrepancies accurately reported to CMS. University officials agreed with the finding. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE COLLEGE STUDENT IMMUNIZATION ACT The University did not comply with the requirements of the College Student Immunization Act (Act). In Fiscal Year 2015, the University entered into a ground lease agreement as a lessor to lease its land to a lessee to develop, finance, construct, and operate the University’s student housing facility. The student housing facility opened for occupancy in fall 2016. During testing of 25 students enrolled in the academic year 2018-2019, we noted the following: • The University did not obtain proof of immunizations against preventable communicable diseases for 14 (56%) students, of which 11 students enrolled in the subsequent semester without providing proof of immunization. • The University did not inform 9 (36%) students of their incomplete immunization as prescribed by the Act and allowed these students to enroll in the subsequent semester. In addition, the University did not file a report with the Department of Public Health (Department) as required by the Act. (Finding 13 pages 43-44) We recommended the University require and maintain for inspection proof of immunization from students prior to allowing the students to attend the University. We also recommended the University file the required reports to the Department in compliance with the Act. Lastly, we recommended the University seek a formal Attorney General opinion on the applicability of the Act. University officials agreed with the finding. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining findings are reportedly being given attention by the University. We will review the University’s progress towards the implementation of our recommendations in our next engagement. AUDITOR’S OPINIONS The financial audit report was previously released. The auditors stated the financial statements of Northeastern Illinois University as of and for the year ended June 30, 2019 are fairly stated in all material respects. The auditors also conducted a Single Audit of the University as required by the Uniform Guidance. Our auditors stated the University complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements that could have a direct and material effect on the University’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2019. ACCOUNTANT’S OPINION The accountants conducted a compliance examination of the University for the year ended June 30, 2020, as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. The accountants stated the University complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described in the report. This Single Audit and compliance examination was conducted by E.C. Ortiz & Co., LLP . JANE CLARK Division Director This report is transmitted in accordance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. FRANK J. MAUTINO Auditor General FJM:JGR