REPORT DIGEST
SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FINANCIAL AUDIT
For the Years Ended: June 30, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Summary of Findings:
Total this audit: 5
Total last audit: 0
Repeated from last audit: 0
Release Date: May 18, 2010
State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND
AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a copy of the Report contact:
Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703
(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887
This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov
SYNOPSIS
·
The Authority paid a commission of $20,000 to
the Executive Director for grants received in noncompliance with the grant
agreements.
·
The Authority did not prepare annual budgets as
required by its bylaws.
·
The Authority did not perform regular bank
reconciliations during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2006, 2007 and
2008. Bank reconciliations that were
performed were inaccurate.
·
The auditor’s qualified the June 30, 2009
financial statements due to substantial doubt about the Authority’s ability to
continue as a going concern.
INTRODUCTION
The
Southeastern Illinois Economic Development Authority (Authority) was created
August 20, 2004 as a result of the Southeastern Illinois Economic Development
Authority Act (70 ILCS 518/ et seq.). Its purpose is to promote industrial,
commercial, residential service, transportation and recreational activities and
facilities to enhance the employment opportunities, public health and general
welfare in a 16 county region in southeastern Illinois.
Section
70(b) of the Southeastern Illinois Economic Development Authority Act (70 ILCS
5/518) states “Beginning 5 years after the effective date of this Act and every
5 years thereafter, the Auditor General shall conduct a financial audit of the
Authority.” Further, Section 3-1 of the
Illinois State Auditing Act requires a financial audit of the Authority as set
forth in Section 70 of the Southeastern Illinois Economic Development Authority
Act.
This
digest covers the financial audit of the Authority for the years ended June 30,
2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The Authority
prepares its financial statements on the cash basis of accounting, which is a
comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting
principles. The auditors’ opinion was
qualified for the year ended June 30, 2009 due to substantial doubt about the
Authority’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The
Authority received no appropriation from the General Assembly. The Authority was financed from fee and
interest income and a $600,000 state grant received in fiscal year 2007. The grant funds were held in the State
Treasury. Other Authority funds were
locally held.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
PAYMENT OF COMMISSIONS
NONCOMPLIANT WITH GRANT AGREEMENTS
The
Authority paid a commission of $20,000 to the Executive Director for grants
received in noncompliance with the grant agreements.
A
component of the Executive Director’s contract states he will receive a Success
Fee of one-third of any fee income received by the Authority, contingent upon
the successful receipt of that fee income and attributable to the Executive
Director. In Fiscal Year 2007, the
Authority received three grants from the Illinois Department of Commerce and
Economic Opportunity (DCEO) totaling $600,000. The administration portion of the grants
totaled 10% or $60,000. The Authority
paid a Success Fee to the Executive Director of one-third of the grant administration
total or $20,000.
Each
of the three DCEO grant agreements states the grantee
shall not pay any bonus or commission for the purpose of obtaining the grant
awarded under the agreement. (Finding
#1, pages 29-30)
We
recommended the Authority seek repayment of the $20,000 paid to the Executive
Director in violation of the terms of the grant agreement.
Authority
officials disagreed with the Auditor General’s conclusion that the Authority
paid its Executive Director a “commission for the purpose of obtaining” the
grants and stated the records maintained by the Authority clearly indicate that
the Executive Director was paid compensation for the administration of the
grants. Further, to resolve this issue,
Authority officials indicated they would amend the agreement with the Executive
Director to clearly delineate that compensation arising from receipt of the
grants is payable only for grant administration and that no compensation is
payable for the purpose of obtaining the grants.
In
an Auditors’ Comment we were encouraged that the Authority stated it would take
steps to resolve the condition described in the finding. In its response the Authority characterizes
the Success fee payments as compensation to the Executive Director for
administering the grant and not for the purpose of obtaining the grant. The payment was paid by the terms of the
Executive Director’s contract as a type of “commission” called a Success fee
for receipt of fee income “attributable to the Executive Director”. Given the two agreements as they were
written, we stand by our conclusion that the Authority paid the Executive
Director a $20,000 commission in violation of the terms of the grant agreement.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH BY-LAWS
The
Southeastern Illinois Economic Development Authority (Authority) did not obtain
annual audits or prepare annual budgets as required by its bylaws.
The
Authority officially began operations in the fiscal year ended June 30,
2006. During our audit of the four
fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, we noted the Authority did not have an annual
audit or examination of its books and records for fiscal years 2006, 2007 or
2008 as required by its bylaws. In
addition, we noted the Authority did not prepare an annual budget for fiscal
years 2007, 2008 or 2009 for the January Board of Directors meeting preceding each fiscal year as required by the bylaws.
Authority
personnel stated that the Audit Committee examined the printed general ledger
register and the bank statements at the end of each year, thereby eliminating
the need for an audit by an external auditor.
However, there was no documentation to support the review by the Audit
Committee. (Finding #2, page 31)
We
recommended the Authority conduct an annual audit or examination of the
Authority’s books and records and prepare an annual budget as required by its
bylaws.
Authority
officials agreed with our recommendation and stated that they would take formal
action to appoint an Audit Committee and retain documentation of the Audit
Committee’s review of the books and records of the Authority. They also indicated they would prepare an
annual budget.
BANK RECONCILIATIONS NOT
PERFORMED OR NOT ACCURATE
There
was no documentation to support that the Authority performed regular bank
reconciliations during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2006, 2007 and
2008. In addition, the bank
reconciliations that were performed were inaccurate.
There are no bank reconciliations
for the following fiscal year end periods:
The following year end bank
reconciliations were inaccurate:
Authority
personnel stated that the bank reconciliations were performed at least
quarterly in order to complete the Report of Receipts and Disbursements for the
Comptroller’s Office. The Authority,
however, was not able to produce any documentation of the quarterly
reconciliations. (Finding #3, page 32)
We
recommended the Authority prepare monthly bank reconciliations and take greater
care to insure that they are prepared accurately.
Authority
officials agreed with our recommendation and indicated that going forward they
would prepare accurate monthly bank reconciliations.
OTHER FINDINGS
The
other findings are reportedly being given attention by the Authority. We will review progress toward implementation
of all recommendations in our next audit.
AUDITORS’ OPINIONS
Our
auditors stated the Southeastern Illinois Economic Development Authority
financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006
were fairly presented in all material respects on the cash basis of
accounting. Auditor’s qualified the June
30, 2009 financial statements due to substantial doubt about the Authority’s
ability to continue as a going concern.
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor
General
WGM:JAF:pp
SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS
Schorb & Schmersahl LLC was our special assistant auditors for these financial audits.