OFFICE OF THE STATE APPELLATE DEFENDER FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT For the Year Ended: Total this audit
2 Release Date:
To obtain a copy of the Report contact: This Report Digest is also available on |
|
OFFICE OF THE STATE APPELLATE DEFENDER
FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT
(In Accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and
OMB Circular A-133)
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 1999
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS | FY 1999 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
Personal Services % of Total Expenditures Average No. of Employees Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement) % of Total Expenditures Contractual Services % of Total Expenditures All Other Operations Items % of Total Expenditures Cost of Property and Equipment |
$10,155,185 |
$9,665,494 |
$9,142,083 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES | FY 1999 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
|
2,418 |
2,430 |
2,230 |
STATE APPELLATE DEFENDER |
During Audit Period: Theodore A. Gottfried Currently: Theodore A. Gottfried |
Improvements in Internal Controls Needed |
MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT CONTROL WEAKNESSES The Agency did not always perform adequate management oversight controls to compensate for a lack of segregation of duties in its fiscal operations. Because of its small size the Agency is not able to achieve an adequate segregation of duties in its fiscal operations. The Chief Fiscal Officer processes and records vouchers, maintains the equipment records, conducts the annual physical inventory, processes the semi-monthly payroll, and reconciles the accounting records. Management was not reviewing the Chief Fiscal Officer's work to compensate for the lack of an adequate segregation of duties. (Finding 1, pages 15-16) Agency officials accepted our recommendation to remove the Chief Fiscal Officers authority to make final approval of vouchers and to review the quarterly fixed asset reports, semi-monthly payroll, and monthly accounting reconciliations prepared by the Chief Fiscal Officer. OTHER FINDING The remaining finding is of lesser significance and is being given attention by management. We will review the status of corrective action in our next compliance audit. AUDITORS OPINION Our auditors state the financial statements of the Office of the State Appellate Defender as of June 30, 1999, and for the year then ended are fairly presented in all material respects.
_____________________________________ WGH:JAF:pp SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS Velma Butler & Company, LTD. were our special assistant auditors for this audit. |