REPORT DIGEST COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT FORECASTING AND
ACCOUNTABILITY COMPLIANCE EXAMINATIONFor the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2005 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 2 Total last audit 0 Repeated from last audit 0 Release Date:
February 14, 2006
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY
(888) 261-2887 This Report Digest is also
available on the worldwide web at http://www.state.il.us/auditor
|
INTRODUCTION
On February 1, 2004, the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability replaced the Economic and Fiscal Commission and Pension Laws Commission pursuant to the Government Forecasting and Accountability Act and the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1984.
SYNOPSIS
· The Commission did not maintain sufficient controls over the recording and reporting of its property. · The Commission did not timely file reports by the statutorily mandated due dates.
{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.} |
COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT FORECASTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY
COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2005
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
FY 2003 |
Total Expenditures (All Funds).................... |
$1,175,718 |
$753,829 |
$772,205 |
Personal Services...................................
% of
Operations Expenditures...........
Average
No. of Employees............... |
$639,378
54.4%
12 |
$496,257
65.8%
10 |
$594,261
77.0%
11 |
Other Payroll Costs (FICA,
Retirement)..
% of
Operations Expenditures........... |
$173,997
14.8% |
$102,615
13.6% |
$126,505
16.4% |
Contractual Services...............................
% of
Operations Expenditures........... |
$55,230
4.7% |
$39,584
5.3% |
$29,969
3.9% |
Lump Sums...........................................
% of Operations Expenditures............... |
$288,242
24.5% |
$99,721
13.2% |
$0
0% |
All Other Operations Items.....................
% of
Operations Expenditures........... |
$18,871
1.6% |
$15,652
2.1% |
$21,470
2.7% |
Cost of
Property and Equipment....................... |
$171,031 |
$176,542 |
$75,541 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY
MEASURES |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
Reports Published.................................................. |
13 |
8 |
Pension Impact Notes Prepared..............................
Debt Impact Notes Prepared..................................
Number of Bills that became Law........................... |
310
105
20 |
140*
52
9 |
*This number reflects the PIN’s prepared on pieces of legislation from February 1, 2004 until June 30, 2004.
AGENCY DIRECTOR |
During Audit Period: Daniel R. Long Currently: Daniel R. Long |
|
|
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROPERTY CONTROL WEAKNESSES The Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability (Commission) did not maintain sufficient controls over the recording and reporting of its property. We noted the following: · The Quarterly Reports of State Property (C-15’s) were inaccurate and did not agree to the Commission’s supporting documentation. The FY04 additions were overstated by $11,761 and the FY05 additions were understated by $4,183. The FY04 deletions were overstated by $15,924. The FY04 net transfers were understated by $3,267 and the FY05 net transfers were overstated by $17,223. In addition, 2 of 8 (25%) reports were not mathematically accurate. · Four of 25 (16%) equipment items tested were not recorded on the property listing at their full cost resulting in an understatement of $94. · The Commission’s equipment did not display a unique six-digit identification number and was not clearly marked to indicate that they were the property of the State of Illinois. The Commission’s equipment inventory totaled $171,031 at June 30, 2005. (Finding 1, pages 8-9) We recommended that Commission strengthen controls over its property. Specifically, the Commission should implement appropriate procedures to ensure all purchases are recorded at full cost and reconcile C-15’s to property records and review for reasonableness prior to submission. In addition, the Board should ensure its equipment marking or tagging procedures comply with applicable laws and rules. Commission
management agreed with the finding and stated
that the spreadsheet formula was set up incorrectly for the C-15’s, and it
was corrected. Commission management also stated that they will ensure
property totals include freight charges and will implement changes to their
current equipment marking procedures. REPORTS NOT TIMELY FILED The Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability (Commission) did not timely file reports by the statutorily mandated due dates. We noted the following: · The FY05 and FY06 “Legislative Capital Plan,” reports on the State’s long-term debt capital needs, were submitted 23 and 33 days late in FY04 and FY05, respectively. ·
The Commission had not reported its findings and
recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly on whether the 90%
funding ratio adopted continues to represent an appropriate goal for
State-funded retirement systems in Illinois as of the end of fieldwork. ·
The “Report on the Costs and Savings of the State
Employees Early Retirement Incentive Program” was submitted on February 23,
2005, 54 days late. (Finding 2, pages
10-11) We recommended the Commission comply with the applicable statutes by submitting the required reports and estimates to the General Assembly and/or the Governor by the statutorily required dates or seek legislative remedy to change the reporting dates. Commission management accepted the finding and stated that the reports were filed late due to the review process to ensure the accuracy of the information. Commission management also stated that the delay in reporting its findings and recommendations to the Governor and General Assembly was a result of significant changes to the Pension Code. AUDITORS’ OPINION
We
conducted a compliance examination of the Office as required by the Illinois
State Auditing Act. We have not
audited any financial statements of the Office for the purpose of expressing
an opinion because the Office does not, nor is it required to, prepare
financial statements.
____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:LKW:pp AUDITORS ASSIGNED
This
examination was performed by staff of the Office of the Auditor General.
|
|
|