REPORT DIGEST COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT FORECASTING AND
ACCOUNTABILITY COMPLIANCE EXAMINATIONFor the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2007 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 3 Total last audit 2 Repeated from last audit 2 Release Date: January 17, 2008
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY
(888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full
Report are also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS
· The Commission did not maintain sufficient controls over the recording and reporting of its property. · The Commission did not include required information in their State Debt Impact Notes. {Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.} |
COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT FORECASTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY
COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2007
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2007 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
Total Expenditures (All Funds).............. |
$1,117,406 |
$1,011,075 |
$1,175,718 |
Personal Services.............................. % of Operations Expenditures......... Average No. of Employees............. |
$710,510
63.6%
13 |
$683,793
67.6%
12 |
$639,378
54.4%
12 |
Other Payroll Costs (FICA,
Retirement).. % of Operations Expenditures........ |
$161,336
14.4% |
$128,628
12.7% |
$173,997
14.8% |
Contractual Services.......................... % of Operations Expenditures........ |
$55,335
5.0% |
$74,967
7.4% |
$55,230
4.7% |
Lump Sums....................................... % of Operations Expenditures.......... |
$165,105
14.8% |
$102,983
10.2% |
$288,242
24.5% |
All Other Operations Items................. % of Operations Expenditures........ |
$25,120
2.2% |
$20,704
2.1% |
$18,871
1.6% |
Cost of Property and Equipment........ |
$186,863 |
$177,102 |
$171,031 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY
MEASURES (not examined) |
FY 2007 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
Reports Published................................................ |
19 |
22 |
13 |
Pension Impact Notes Prepared............................
Debt Impact Notes Prepared................................
Number of Pension Bills that became Law............ |
311
84
5 |
156
37
31 |
310
105
20 |
AGENCY DIRECTOR |
During Audit Period: Dan R. Long Currently: Dan R. Long |
Equipment items
were not recorded at correct amounts
|
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROPERTY CONTROL WEAKNESSES The Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability (Commission) did not maintain sufficient controls over the recording and reporting of its property. We noted the following:
·
The Commission
did not timely record equipment additions on its property listing or
Quarterly Reports of State Property (C-15’s). Fourteen equipment additions totaling $2,564 were recorded
between 6 and 10 months late. In
addition, two equipment purchases totaling $725 were never recorded on the
Commission’s C-15’s.
·
The Commission
did not reconcile its property listing to the C-15’s filed with the Illinois
Office of the Comptroller (IOC). The
June 30, 2007 amount reported on the C-15 did not agree to the Commission’s
property listing as of June 30, 2007.
A difference of $1,007 was not reconciled or explained. In addition, the Commission’s property and
equipment expenditures processed by the IOC during FY06 did not reconcile to
additions recorded on the Quarterly C-15 reports. Property and equipment expenditures totaling $4,078 were never
recorded on the C-15’s.
·
The Commission
included computer software and licenses on its property control records. We noted 30 computer software and
licensing items totaling $21,697 on the Commission’s property listing as of
June 30, 2007.
·
Four equipment
items were not recorded on the Commission’s property records at the proper
amounts. Three items were understated
by a total of $212 and 1 item was overstated by $300.
·
The Commission did not submit its C-15’s by the
reporting deadlines. Two of 8 (25%)
C-15’s submitted during the examination period were filed 2 and 3 days
late. (Finding 1, pages 8-9) We recommended the Commission strengthen internal controls over equipment and ensure all equipment is accurately and timely recorded on the Commission’s property records. Further, the Commission should follow Statewide Accounting Management System procedures for completing accounting reports pertaining to Quarterly Reports of State Property. The Commission should also reconcile its property reports and records to the C-15’s and IOC expenditure reports for property on a quarterly basis to ensure completeness and accuracy of its property records. Lastly, the Commission should submit its Quarterly Reports of State Property by the reporting deadlines. Commission management agreed with the finding and stated that they have implemented changes to correct the deficiencies. STATE DEBT IMPACT NOTES DID NOT INCLUDE REQUIRED INFORMATION The Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability (Commission) did not include required information in their State Debt Impact Notes. We reviewed 25 State Debt Impact Notes (Notes) of which 3 Notes were
related to legislation that would add new or increase existing bond
authorization levels. Three of 3
(100%) Notes tested did not include the required assessment of current
outstanding, unissued, retired bond authorization levels nor did it include
the total principal on all other then-outstanding bonds of the State. (Finding 3, page 12) We recommended the Commission include in its State Debt Impact Notes all the information required by the State Debt Impact Note Act. Commission management agreed with the finding and stated that a strict interpretation of the statute requires each Debt Impact Note to include information stating the outstanding, unissued, and retired bond authorization and principal outstanding and the Commission will begin reporting this information on all future Debt Impact Notes. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining finding is reportedly being given attention by Commission management. We will review progress toward implementation of our recommendations during our next examination. AUDITORS’ OPINION
We conducted a compliance examination
of the Commission as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We have not audited any financial
statements of the Office for the purpose of expressing an opinion because the
Office does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial statements.
____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:GR:pp AUDITORS ASSIGNED
This
examination was performed by staff of the Office of the Auditor General. |