USE OF PUBLIC BUILDING FUND-409 The
Capital Development Board (CDB) used $496,315 of
Public Building Fund monies to pay unrelated
expenses.
The Public Building Fund contains escrow money
for the defeased Illinois Building Authority
bonds. According to the Capital Development Board
Act, the money in this fund may be used only for
defeasance of the bonds and related
administrative and insurance expenses. Remaining
funds are to be transmitted to the State
Treasurer who, in turn, is required to transfer
any remaining balances into the General Revenue
Fund each calendar quarter.
The CDB used this fund to pay unrelated
expenses including personal services, travel,
statistical services, operation of auto and
equipment.
We recommended the CDB spend Public Building
Fund money only for the purpose for which the
money is intended. (Finding 1, page 8) We
first reported a finding in this area in 1994.
According to the response, CDB officials do
not agree with our interpretation of the law.
Citing a different section of the law, CDB
officials hold that the CDB should be allowed to
use excess interest for its own administrative
costs, since it is the successor agency to the
Illinois Building Authority. The response
indicates the CDB will continue to operate under
this assumption until the revenue source (for the
Public Building Fund) is depleted at the end of
fiscal year 1997.
Our auditors note that the law cited in the
CDB response pertains to the establishment of
charges, fees, and rentals on facilities built
with bond proceeds. That law would permit the CDB
to "pay the principal of and interest on the
bonds and a proportion of the administrative
expenses of [the agency] as provided for by
each lease" (emphasis added). Currently,
however, there are no leases. The bonds have been
net defeased and the related buildings are no
longer administered by the CDB.
As stated by our auditors, we believe a
different section of the law [20 ILCS 3105/10.01A
(c) and (d)] would now control; The law we cite
pertains specifically to the defeased bond escrow
account. It would not permit the fund to be used
to pay any operating expenses that are unrelated
to the administration of the escrow account.
OTHER FINDINGS
The remaining finding and recommendation was
less significant and has been given appropriate
attention by Agency management. We will review
progress toward implementation of our
recommendation during our next audit. Agency
responses were provided by Ms. Sharon Stapleton,
chief auditor.