WILLIAM G. HOLLAND To obtain a copy of the Report contact: This Report Digest is also available on |
SYNOPSIS
|
JOHN A. GRAHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER
COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 1998
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
|
$29,005,661 $18,142,198 $340,312 $2,269,399 $5,052,166 $3,201,586 $28,720,965 |
$26,594,675 $16,864,979 $271,484 $2,077,487 $4,531,142 $2,849,583 $28,438,434 |
$25,022,135 $16,034,777 $271,152 $1,938,632 $4,418,756 $2,358,818 $27,882,313 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
Average Number of Inmates | 1,903 |
1,489 |
1,437 |
Ratio of Correctional Officers to Inmates | 1/5.65 |
1/4.70 |
1/4.41 |
Cost Per Year Per Inmate | $15,196 |
$17,668 |
$17,343 |
Rated Inmate Capacity | 1,174 |
1,174 |
1,030 |
Approximate Square Feet Per Inmate | 26 |
31 |
35 |
CENTER WARDEN(S) |
During Audit Period: Kenneth P. Dobucki Currently: Anthony W. Suggs, Acting (September 1, 1998) |
Net overpayments total $1,227
About 6.4% of total inventory was overstocked
Debit card vending system not bid |
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND PAYROLL PAYMENT ERRORS The Center incorrectly calculated gross pay to three employees out of 90 we tested resulting in a total net over payment of $1,227. One employee was paid for 22.5 hours of compensatory time the employee was not entitled to, resulting in an overpayment of $379. Another employee was paid for 8.75 days of compensatory time instead of 8.75 hours, resulting in an overpayment of about $861. A third employee was not paid $13 in longevity pay earned. (Finding 98-1, page 8) We recommended the Center review the timekeeping and payroll process, having supervisory personnel review unusual items, such as compensatory time. Further, the Center should consider automating calculations for compensatory time, vacation, and sick leave. The Center responded that the local timekeeping process will be reviewed and it will implement supervisory approval for unusual items but that the decision to automate functions cannot be made at the Center level. OVERSTOCKED INVENTORY The Center had $21,253 of overstocked inventory on hand at June 30, 1998. This represented 6.4% of total inventory. At June 30, 1998, 52 different items were identified that exceeded a one year supply on hand. Department directives state that current needs be based on the previous 12 months usage. Prudent business practices require close monitoring of inventory for surplus items. (Finding 98-3, page 10) We recommended the Center review inventory on a quarterly basis and document reasons why excess items should not be transferred to the surplus inventory list. The Agency response stated the recommendation had been implemented. VENDING CONTRACT NOT COMPETITIVELY BID The Center awarded a vending contract for the employee benefit fund to a supplier without obtaining other bids. The Center eliminated the employee commissary and replaced it with a debit card vending system to eliminate the need for money inside the Center. A vending supplier who was already doing business at the Center was the only supplier contacted. The vendor agreed to provide the system and to give the employee benefit fund 10 percent of all monies received. We estimated annual sales to approach $58,500. We noted that several vending companies were listed in the area phone book and that the last time vending contracts were bid, the Center received three bids. (Finding 98-4, page 11) We recommended the Center obtain competitive bids when awarding contracts for vending at the Center. The Agency accepted the recommendation and stated the vending contract will be bid when the current contract ends. OTHER FINDING The other finding was less significant. It dealt with improper allocation of lapse period expenditures. We will review progress toward implementing all recommendations in our next audit. AUDITORS' OPINION We conducted a compliance audit of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our single audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the Department of Corrections will be presented in the single audit report.
WGH:KMC:pp SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors for this audit were Scheffel & Company, P.C.
|