REPORT DIGEST
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ILLINOIS YOUTH CENTER -
JOLIET LIMITED SCOPE COMPLIANCE ATTESTATION EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2006 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 4 Total last audit 5 Repeated from last audit 2 Release Date: June 20, 2007
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report is also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS ¨ The Center had inadequate internal controls over locally held funds. ¨ The Center did not maintain a perpetual inventory system as required by the Illinois Department of Corrections.
{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the next page.} |
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
LIMITED
SCOPE
COMPLIANCE ATTESTATION ENGAGEMENT
For The Two Years
Ended June 30, 2006
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
·
Total Expenditures (All Appropriated Funds)....................................................... |
$14,754,949 |
$15,589,187 |
$15,471,348 |
Personal
Services...........................................
% of Total Expenditures........................
Average No. of Employees....................
Average Salary Per Employee...............
Student,
Member and Inmate Compensation.........
% of Total Expenditures................................. |
$10,682,016
72.4%
201
$53,144
$14,580
0.1% |
$10,830,763
69.5%
212
$51,089
$39,441
0.2% |
$10,747,835
69.5%
227
$47,347
$49,091
0.3% |
Other Payroll
Costs (FICA, Retirement)..........
% of Total Expenditures........................ |
$1,760,350
11.9% |
$2,480,050
16.0% |
$2,298,056
14.8% |
Contractual
Services......................................
% of Total Expenditures........................ |
$1,850,582
12.6% |
$1,735,073
11.1% |
$1,710,311
11.1% |
All Other
Items..............................................
% of Total Expenditures........................ |
$447,421
3.0% |
$503,860
3.2% |
$666,055
4.3% |
·
Cost of Property and Equipment................ |
$29,568,610 |
$29,571,327 |
$29,638,613 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY
MEASURES
(Not Examined) |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
·
Average Number of Inmates........................... |
250 |
260 |
304 |
·
Ratio of Correctional
Officers to Inmates........ |
1 / 1.66 |
1 / 1.64 |
1 / 1.78 |
·
Cost Per Year Per Inmate............................. |
$58,921 |
$59,958 |
$50,704 |
·
Rated Resident Capacity................................... |
344 |
344 |
344 |
·
Approximate Square Feet
Per Inmate................ |
54 |
62 |
37 |
CENTER WARDEN(S) |
During Audit Period:
John Rita, Acting (7/1/04 –
6/30/05)
Larry Peterson (7/1/05 –
6/30/06)
Current: Larry
Peterson |
Problems with reconciliations Untimely
deposits
Documentation
issues The Center did not use an automated inventory
management system |
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
INADEQUATE INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER LOCALLY HELD FUNDS The Center had inadequate internal controls over locally held funds. The Center maintains four locally held funds. During our examination we noted: · Of 78 reconciliations tested, 14 (18%) did not contain evidence that the reconciliation was reviewed and approved by Center Management. Thirty nine reconciliations (50%) did not contain monthly reconciliations of cashier receipts issued during the month to deposits received by the bank. · Of 52 receipts tested totaling $46,976, twelve (23%) receipts accounting for $18,211 (38%) were not deposited timely. These receipts were deposited between 1 and 28 days late. · Of 69 disbursements tested totaling $41,543, two (3%) disbursements accounting for $350 did not have proper supporting documentation such as vendor invoices. One disbursement (1%) accounting for $4,814 did not agree to the supporting documentation. (Finding 2, pages 11- 12) We recommended that the Center implement appropriate procedures to ensure that: 1)reconciliations were reviewed and approved; 2)cash receipts were reconciled to bank deposits; 3) receipts were deposited timely, and 4) supporting documentation was maintained and reconciled to disbursements. Department officials accepted our recommendations and stated the facility will make every effort to comply with the Administrative Directive and statutory requirements. PERPETUAL INVENTORY SYSTEM NOT MAINTAINED The Center did not maintain a perpetual inventory system as required by the Illinois Department of Corrections Administrative Directives. For 18 months during the examination period, the Center did not use an automated inventory management system to track commodity items received and issued at the Center. As of December 2004, the Center stopped using the Automated Inventory Management System (AIMS). The Center anticipated they would begin using a replacement system, the Inventory Management System (TIMS). However, as of June 30, 2006, they had not yet started using TIMS. The Center maintained a manual inventory system where quantities received, quantities issued and a balance were recorded for each item on individual inventory cards. These cards did not indicate unit prices, total costs or calculate a weighted-average cost. (Finding 3, page 13) We recommended the Center start using an inventory management system to ensure that the inventory is properly tracked, priced and reported. Department officials accepted our recommendation and stated the Department is currently in the process of implementing a real time inventory system. The new system will address the issues noted in the audit. OTHER FINDINGS
The remaining two findings dealt with inadequate
trust fund procedures and inaccurate fixed asset reporting. We will review
the Center’s progress toward implementation of all recommendations in our
next compliance examination. AUDITOR’S OPINION We conducted a compliance attestation examination
of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. This was a limited scope compliance
examination that also included performing certain audit procedures with
respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our audit of the
entire Department of Corrections.
Financial statements for the entire Department will be presented in
that report. ____________________________________ WILLIAM
G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:KMC:drh SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors for
this examination were De Raimo Hillger & Ripp. |