WILLIAM G. HOLLAND To obtain a copy of the Report contact: This Report Digest is also available on |
SYNOPSIS
|
ILLINOIS YOUTH CENTER - WARRENVILLE
COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 1998
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
|
$5,859,335 $4,083,331 $31,614 $516,262 $799,235 $428,893 $5,388,453 |
$5,433,674 $3,662,726 $26,228 $454,306 $873,524 $416,890 $5,355,929 |
$4,905,927 $ 3,026,830 $28,215 $368,675 $817,743 $664,464 $5,298,111 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
Average Number of Inmates | 160 |
163 |
141 |
Ratio of Correctional Officers to Inmates | 1/2.67 |
1/2.96 |
1/2.47 |
Cost Per Year Per Inmate | $36,971 |
$33,880 |
$34,412 |
Rated Inmate Capacity | 108 |
108 |
108 |
Approximate Square Feet Per Inmate | 53 |
52 |
60 |
CENTER SUPERINTENDENT |
During Audit Period: Glenda M. Blakemore Currently: Glenda M. Blakemore |
Auditors identified four invoices for services or goods received in FY 98 but paid in FY 99
The Center did not enter an automobile purchase in the property control system nor did staff identify the automobile in an annual observation of property
Audit tests showed receipt of commodities in Fiscal Year 1998 were not recorded in the Department's inventory system until, on average, 21 calendar days after receipt
Because the Center did not properly maintain a General Ledger the Center inaccurately recorded its assets as of June 30, 1998 |
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IMPROPER RECORDING OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE The Center did not properly record accounts payable. The Center did not enter information from vendor invoices into the accounts payable system until the Center was ready to pay the invoices. Thus, accounts payable were never accurately recorded in the system. During testing of unrecorded liabilities we identified four invoices, totaling $1,495, that were for services or goods received in Fiscal Year 1998 but were paid in Fiscal Year 1999. Generally accepted accounting principles and the Department of Correction's Administrative Directive 2.40.101 require recognition and recording of liabilities in the period in which the services or goods are received. (Finding 98-1, page 11) We recommended the Center enter invoices into the accounts payable system on a timely basis. Center management agreed with the recommendation and stated that Business Office staff will monitor input efforts to ensure compliance with the recommendation. PURCHASED AUTOMOBILE NOT RECORDED The Center did not record an automobile purchase within the Department's property control system. The Department's Administrative Directive 2.75.104 requires purchased property to be tagged and entered into the Property Control System (PCS). However, Center staff did not initially tag a new automobile or enter the appropriate data into the PCS. In addition, when Center staff conducted their annual observation of property, they did not identify the automobile as an untagged and unlisted item. Because the Center did not enter the purchase into the system, and did not discover the error in its annual observation of property, the Center's fixed asset reports submitted to the Department's Central Office understated property by $14,900, which was the cost of the automobile. (Finding 98-2, page 12) We recommended the Center comply with Department administrative directives and properly tag and record purchases of fixed assets. Center management agreed with the recommendation noting that the automobile was subsequently tagged and recorded as a Center fixed asset. UNTIMELY PROCESSING OF INVENTORY TRANSACTIONS The Center did not properly maintain a perpetual record of the quantity and dollar value of items in the Center's inventory. Center staff did not promptly record inventory received or issued out of inventory. Audit tests showed receipt of commodities in Fiscal Year 1998 were not recorded in the Department's inventory system until, on average, 21 calendar days after receipt. Meanwhile, commodities taken out of inventory in Fiscal Year 1998 were not deducted from the inventory system until, on average, 32 days after distribution. In addition, there were similar delays in recording receipt (average time of 18 days) and disbursement (29 days) of inventory in Fiscal Year 1997. The lack of timely recording of inventory into the Department's computer system reduces the Center's internal control over commodity expenditures as it limits the Center's ability to safeguard and properly order commodities. (Finding 98-3, page 13) We recommended the Center establish a schedule to timely record inventory transactions into the Department's system. We also recommended the Center train additional personnel to perform this function when responsible staff are absent. Center management accepted the recommendation and noted that staff will be monitored to ensure timely recording of inventory transactions. LACK OF A GENERAL LEDGER The Center did not maintain a General Ledger of accounting activities for the period of November 1997 through June 30, 1998. Department of Correction's Administrative Directive 2.26.104 requires Center accounting staff to update the General Ledger each month. The Center did not perform this update nor did it reconcile its General Ledger with reports submitted to the Department's Central Office or the Comptroller's Office. As a result the Center inaccurately recorded the assets held by the Center as of June 30, 1998. (Finding 98-4, page 15) We recommended that the Center process, post, and reconcile the General Ledger by the 20th of the subsequent month to allow the accurate filing of reports to the Department's Central Office and the Comptroller's Office. Center management concurred with the recommendation. AUDITORS' OPINION We conducted a compliance audit of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our single audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the Department will be presented in the single audit report.
WGH:JAW:ak SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors for this audit were Duffner & Company, P.C. |