REPORT DIGEST SHAWNEE CORRECTIONAL CENTER LIMITED
SCOPE COMPLIANCE ATTESTATION EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2004 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 5 Total last audit 1 Repeated from last audit 0 Release Date: April 21, 2005
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TDD (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest is also
available on the worldwide web at http://www.state.il.us/auditor
|
SYNOPSIS ¨ The Center did not conduct independent inventory test counts on the Employee Commissary inventory. ¨ The Center did not approve a contract timely.
{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.} |
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
SHAWNEE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2004
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2004 |
FY 2003 |
FY 2002 |
! Total
Expenditures (All Appropriated Funds)...... |
$30,773,194 |
$29,648,802 |
$31,546,223 |
|
|
|
|
Personal Services...................................................... % of Total Expenditures................................... Average No. of Employees............................... Average Salary Per Employee.......................... Student, member and inmate compensation...................... % of
Total Expenditures............................................. |
$17,940,431 58.3% 360 $49,834 $402,422 1.3% |
$17,946,740 60.5% 387 $46,374 $418,999 1.4% |
$18,600,249 58.96% 426 $43,663 $415,795 1.32% |
Other Payroll
Costs (FICA, Retirement)..................... % of Total Expenditures................................... |
$3,828,825 12.4% |
$4,116,560 13.9% |
$4,241,108 13.44% |
Contractual
Services.................................................. % of Total Expenditures................................... |
$5,238,617 17.0% |
$4,822,244 16.3% |
$4,605,464 14.6% |
Commodities............................................................. % of
Total Expenditures All Other
Items......................................................... % of Total Expenditures....................................... |
$2,943,269 9.9% $419,630 1.1% |
$1,991,068 6.7% $353,191 1.2% |
$3,305,499 10.48% $378,108 1.2% |
! Cost of Property
and Equipment........................... |
$47,219,827 |
$46,175,563 |
$46,097,542 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY
MEASURES |
FY 2004 |
FY 2003 |
FY 2002 |
! Average Number
of Inmates..................................... |
2,016 |
1,998 |
1,955 |
! Ratio of
Correctional Officers to Inmates................... |
1/7.2 |
1/6.8 |
1/6.1 |
! Cost Per Year
Per Inmate......................................... |
$15,219 |
$14,832 |
$16,127 |
! Rated Inmate
Capacity.................................................. |
1,046 |
1,046 |
1,046 |
! Approximate
Square Feet Per Inmate............................. |
32 |
32 |
34 |
CENTER WARDEN(S) |
During Audit Period: Donald Young (7/1/02 to 8/31/02), Joe
Parker (10/1/02 to 12/31/02), Kimberly Bigley (1/1/03 to 10/15/03), Terry
McCann (10/16/03 to 6/30/04) Currently: Terry McCann |
Employee Commissary
inventory was not independently counted The Center did not
approve a contract before execution |
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS NEED TO PERFORM PHYSICAL COUNTS ON INVENTORY The Center did not conduct an independent inventory test count on the Employee Commissary physical inventory. The Employee Commissary supervisor orders, receives and physically counts merchandise in the Employee Commissary. Inventory at June 30, 2004 was $4,625. Good business practices dictate the person conducting the test counts should be independent of the physical inventory count. Center personnel indicated the internal control weakness had been mitigated in the past by an independent person periodically performing a 10% test count of the month end inventory. Due to the decrease in staffing, however, the Center elected to cease performing this test count. We recommended the Center perform independent test counts on the Employee Commissary after the physical inventory is conducted. (Finding 1, page 11) Center officials responded that they had implemented our recommendation. CONTRACT
WAS NOT TIMELY APPROVED The Center did not approve a
contractual agreement prior to the start date of the contract. The Center signed a contract on October
23, 2002. However the contract period
was July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2007.
The contract was for $218,117. Good business practices require all
contracts entered into be approved by all involved parties prior to the
execution of the contract. SAMS
procedures 15.20.30 states, the “Comptroller shall reject vouchers for
payment of professional or artistic skills if the contract for such services
involves expenditures for more than $5,000 unless (1) the contract has been
reduced to writing before the services are performed, or (2) the agency has
filed an affidavit.” We recommended the Center strengthen
controls to ensure contractual agreements are approved prior to the execution
of the contract. (Finding 5, page 16) Center officials responded by stating they will make every effort to
comply with the contracting requirements and obtain affidavits as needed. AUDITORS’ OPINION We conducted a limited scope compliance attestation engagement of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the Department will be presented in that report. _____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:MKL:pp SPECIAL
ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors were Dycus, Bradley & Draves, P.C. |