REPORT DIGEST SHAWNEE CORRECTIONAL CENTER LIMITED
SCOPE COMPLIANCE ATTESTATION EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2006 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 6 Total last audit 5 Repeated from last audit 1 Release Date: June 20, 2007
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and full
Report is also available on the worldwide web at |
SYNOPSIS § The Center did not conduct an independent review of payroll vouchers. § The Center did not maintain adequate segregation of duties over property control.
{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.} |
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
SHAWNEE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2006
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
Total Expenditures (All Appropriated Funds)........ |
$30,255,110 |
$31,928,935 |
$30,773,194 |
|
|
|
|
Personal Services...................................................
% of Total Expenditures...................................
Average No. of Employees...............................
Average Salary Per Employee.......................... Student, member and inmate compensation............... % of Total Expenditures....................................... |
$18,750,334
62.%
357
$52,522
$361,592
1.2% |
$18,880,973
59.1%
352
$53,639
$380,031
1.2% |
$17,940,431
58.3%
360
$49,834
$402,422
1.3% |
Other Payroll
Costs (FICA, Retirement).....................
% of Total Expenditures................................... |
$3,087,466
10.2% |
$4,317,042
13.5% |
$3,828,825
12.4% |
Contractual
Services..................................................
% of Total Expenditures................................... |
$5,420,371
17.9% |
$5,544,883
17.4% |
$5,238,617
17.0% |
Commodities.............................................................
% of
Total Expenditures
All Other
Items......................................................... % of Total Expenditures.................................... |
$2,355,026
7.8%
$280,321
.90% |
$2,488,369
7.8%
$317,637
1.0% |
$2,943,269
9.9%
$419,630
1.1% |
Cost of Property and Equipment............................. |
$46,671,156 |
$46,995,748 |
$47,219,827 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY
MEASURES (not examined) |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
Average Number of Inmates................................. |
1,998 |
1,996 |
2,016 |
Ratio of Correctional Officers to Inmates............... |
1/7.0 |
1/6.9 |
1/7.2 |
Cost Per Year Per Inmate................................... |
$15,136 |
$15,991 |
$15,219 |
Rated Inmate Capacity....................................... |
1,046 |
1,046 |
1,046 |
Approximate Square Feet Per Inmate.................. |
32 |
33 |
32 |
CENTER WARDEN(S) |
Warden
(4/1/06 to 8/14/06) Mr. Jay Merchant
Warden (10/1/03 to 3/31/06) Mr. Terry McCann |
Payroll vouchers
not independently reviewed
Employee performed
physical inventory and had access to the Property Control System |
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS LACK OF INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF PAYROLL DOCUMENTATION The Center payroll vouchers were not independently verified to agree to the approved timesheets. The payroll clerk inputs approved timesheets data into the payroll system, which generates the payroll voucher and paycheck. After processing, warrants are returned to the payroll clerk. The Business Administrator does not review the payroll information. (Finding 2, page 10) We recommended a person independent of the payroll voucher input verify it accuracy. Center officials responded that they had implemented our recommendation. INADEQUATE
SEGREGATION OF DUTIES OVER PROPERTY CONTROL The Center did not maintain adequate
segregation of duties over property control. An employee responsible for performing
physical inventory counts of equipment also had the ability to add, change,
and delete transactions in the Property Control System. (Finding 3, page 11) We recommended an employee who performs
physical inventory counts of equipment not have access to the Property
Control System. Center officials responded that they had implemented our recommendation. AUDITORS’ OPINION We conducted a limited scope compliance attestation engagement of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the Department will be presented in that report. _____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:MKL:pp SPECIAL
ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors were Doehring, Winders & Co. LLP. |