REPORT DIGEST

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

STATEVILLE
CORRECTIONAL CENTER

COMPLIANCE AUDIT

For the 2 Years Ended:
June 30, 2000

Summary of Findings:

Total this audit 6
Total last audit 4
Repeated from last audit 3

Release Date:
April 10, 2001

Logo.gif (1870 bytes)

State of Illinois
Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND

AUDITOR GENERAL

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:
Office of the Auditor General
Attn: Records Manager
Iles Park Plaza
740 E. Ash Street
Springfield, IL 62703

(217) 782-6046 or TDD (217) 524-4646
This Report Digest is also available on the worldwide web at http://www.state.il.us/auditor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

 

 

 

  • The Center did not have an adequate disaster recovery plan for an accounting system that resulted in the issuance of duplicate checks.
  • The Center had inadequate controls over operation of automobile expenditures.
  • Significant fluctuations in profits and losses occurred in the Inmate Commissary Fund.

 

 

{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the next page.}

 

 

 

 

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
STATEVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For the Two Years Ended June 30, 2000

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 2000

FY 1999

FY 1998

Total Expenditures (All Appropriated Funds)

Personal Services

% of Total Expenditures

$61,140,407

$39,512,158

64.63%

$56,042,096

$37,568,400

67.04%

$52,000,893

$35,446,803

68.17%

Average No. of Employees

938

946

925

Average Salary Per Employee

$42,124

$39,713

$38,321

Inmate Compensation (If Applicable)

$354,527

$306,999

$293,637

% of Total Expenditures

.58%

.55%

.56%

Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement)

$8,894,951

$6,390,038

$4,446,301

% of Total Expenditures

14.55%

11.40%

8.55%

Contractual Services

$5,964,999

$5,655,677

$5,494,114

% of Total Expenditures

9.75%

10.09%

10.57%

All Other Items .

$6,413,772

$6,120,982

$6,320,038

% of Total Expenditures

10.49%

10.92%

12.15%

Cost of Property and Equipment

$66,342,050

$65,282,756

$61,440,624

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES

FY 2000

FY1999

FY1998

Average Number of Inmates

2,632

2,450

2,393

Ratio of Correctional Officers to Inmates

1 / 4.2

1 / 3.8

1 / 3.8

Average Costs Per Inmate

$23,158

$22,818

$21,653

Rated Inmate Capacity

2,000

2,000

1,804

Approximate Square Feet Per Inmate

42

46

53

CENTER WARDEN
During Audit Period: Dwayne Clark (7/1/98 to 5/15/99), James Page (5/16/99 to 6/30/00)
Currently: Kenneth Briley
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Duplicate checks were issued due to a power outage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Center paid for repairs to autos owned by other correctional centers

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INADEQUATE COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE FACTS SYSTEM

The Center did not have an adequate disaster recovery plan related to its FACTS system (an automated accounting system used to record receipts and disbursements for inmate trust funds). .

In June 2000, the Center had a power outage. At the time, the Business Office staff was processing checks. After power was restored, the system did not record the previous processed checks. This resulted in several conditions: 1) duplicate checks were issued; 2) checks cleared the bank with different amounts than recorded on the Center’s accounting records; and 3) an inability to reconcile bank statements to the Center’s General Ledger.

Center management stated that staff did not realize the system issued duplicate checks until after distribution and the system failed to recover necessary data after the power loss. (Finding 1, pages 10-11)

We recommended the Center continue to identify duplicate checks and reconcile bank statements to Center records. We also recommended using adequate disaster recovery plans to protect against duplicate checks.

Center officials stated the recommendation had been partially implemented and the FACTS system would be updated to prevent recovery errors.

INADEQUATE CONTROLS FOR OPERATIONS OF AUTOMOBILE EXPENDITURES

The Center had inadequate controls over automobile expenditures.

The Center paid for repairs to six State vehicles that were not assigned to the Center or its personnel. The use of Stateville appropriations to pay for vehicles assigned to other correctional centers was unauthorized. (Finding 3, page 13)

We recommended the Center implement controls to ensure expenditures are in conformance with authorized appropriations. Center management

In November 1998, the Center started to deposit receipts, from vending machine sales to employees, into the Employees’ Benefit Fund Employee Benefit Fund. However Department Administrative Directive 02.44.110A-J requires a correctional center to report sales from vending machines within an income statement for a commissary fund.

When the Center purchased goods for resale to employees, it did not comply with the Illinois procurement Code. The Procurement Code 30 ILCS 500/20-5 required the Center to use competitive bids because the purchase of goods amounted to $94,992 in Fiscal Year 1999 and $151,615 in Fiscal Year 2000.

The Center’s controls over vending machine operations were inadequate. For example, the Center used a debit card system in which employees must first buy a debit card in order to purchase items from the vending machines. We found the debit card machine did not record the cash put into the machine although it had this capability. In effect, the Center had no data on the amount of cash put into the machine or the outstanding debit cards in circulation. In addition, the Center did not record the inventory purchased from vendors and therefore could not accurately account for the vending machine inventory. (Finding 1, Page 9)

We recommended the Center implement adequate controls to safeguard State monies, ensure accurate accounting records, and comply with State laws and Department directives. Center officials accepted the recommendation.

AUDITORS’ OPINION

We conducted a compliance audit of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the entire Department will be presented in that report.

___________________________________

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

WGH:JAW:ak

SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS

Our Special Assistant Auditors for this audit were DeRaimo, Hillger & Ripp, CPAs.

Profits for the inmate commissary should be reasonable and consistent

Center officials agreed with our recommendation to implement controls to ensure expenditures are in conformance with authorized appropriations.

COMMISSARY PROFIT FLUCTUATIONS

Significant fluctuations in the inmate commissary profits occurred during Fiscal Year 1999 and 2000.

Audit testing of commissary profits identified several months with significant fluctuations in profits and losses:

Fiscal Year 1999

February $15,430 loss

March $27,095 profit

Fiscal Year 2000

September $4,588 loss

October $42,186 profit

November $20,018 profit

April $6,405 loss

May $20,788 profit

The Unified Code of Corrections 730 ILCS 5/3-7-2a requires a correctional center commissary to establish a selling price based on cost with an additional charge of 3% to 10%. The Stateville Inmate Commissary profits should fall within a reasonable and consistent range.

Center management stated the fluctuations occurred due to subsequent adjustments after incorrect inventory counts or incorrect input into computer system. (Finding 4, page 14)

Center officials accepted our recommendation to: 1) implement internal control procedures to ensure proper physical inventory counts and data entry; and 2) investigate and report significant fluctuations in profits and losses.

AUDITORS' OPINION

We conducted a compliance audit of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the entire Department will be presented in that report.

___________________________________

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

WGH:JAW:ak

SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS

Our Special Assistant Auditors for this audit were Pandolfi, Topolski, Weiss & Co., LTD.