WILLIAM G. HOLLAND To obtain a copy of the Report contact: This Report Digest is also available on |
SYNOPSIS
|
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
STATEVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 1998
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
|
$52,000,893 $35,446,803 $293,637 $4,446,301 $5,494,114 5,522,156 $797,882 $61,440,624 |
$50,776,942 $34,710,890 $192,890 $4,318,693 $5,872,947 4,935,798 $745,724 $58,031,042 |
$45,529,868 $30,962,317 $255,740 $3,785,226 $5,304,778 4,550,381 $671,426 $55,087,895 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
Average Number of Inmates | 2,393 |
2,377 |
2,399 |
Ratio of Correctional Officers to Inmates | 1/ 3.78 |
1/ 3.74 |
1/ 3.93 |
Cost Per Year Per Inmate | $21,653 |
$21,271 |
$18,903 |
Rated Inmate Capacity | 1,804 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
Approximate Square Feet Per Inmate | 53 |
54 |
53 |
CENTER WARDEN(S) |
During Audit Period: George DeTella (thru April 12, 1998), Dwayne Clark Currently: Dwayne Clark |
Seven employees had access to information systems although such access was
incompatible with their responsibilities. A report to the Comptroller's Office overstated a cash balance by $104,870. Six employees were either underpaid or overpaid resulting in a net underpayment of $1,142. |
INADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES The Center did not have an adequate segregation of duties in several areas of operations. A proper segregation of duties did not exist between the receipt and payment functions at the motor pool garage. Receiving reports were prepared by the accounting section rather than by staff receiving goods at the motor pool. In addition, staff had access to Department information systems although such access was either incompatible with their assignments or was unnecessary. For example, seven staff persons had access to the Budgetary and Accounting Report System although their responsibilities did not require access. Further, one employee was responsible for data entry of voucher information and the review and approval of the data entry. In this activity, different staff should enter the data and review or approve the data input before transmittal of voucher information to the Department's Central Office. (Finding 98-2, pages 12-14) We recommended the Center implement procedures to create an adequate segregation of duties and to provide sufficient internal controls. Further, the Center should review employee access to all information systems periodically to ensure that access is not granted to employees whose current duties are incompatible with the access granted to them. Center officials accepted the recommendation and stated they are in the process of implementing corrective action. IMPROPER RECONCILIATIONS The Center did not properly perform reconciliations for locally held funds. As a result, a June 30, 1998 report to the Comptroller's Office did not reconcile with the Center's General Ledger, outstanding loans between the locally held funds did not reconcile, and the bank reconciliations did not accurately list outstanding checks and deposits. Because Center staff did not properly use the General Ledger to create Comptroller reports, the Center's June 30, 1998 Inmate Commissary Fund Report to the Comptroller's Office overstated the cash balance of the Commissary Fund by $104,870. Also, Center records showed a difference of $66,191 for the receivables and payables between the locally held funds. Further, an Employee Benefit Fund bank statement reconciliation did not agree with the Center's General Ledger because two voided checks were improperly included. (Finding 98-1, pages 11-12) We recommended the Center take action to ensure staff properly perform all reconciliations. Center officials stated that this recommendation has been implemented. INADEQUATE AND INACCURATE PAYROLL AND PERSONNEL RECORDS Audit tests showed the following deficiencies among personnel and payroll records.
We recommended the Center ensure accurate calculation of hours worked and retention of required documentation. Center officials accepted our recommendation and stated staff will strive to perform manual calculations accurately. Further, appropriate measures have been taken to ensure proper retention of records. OTHER FINDING The remaining finding is less significant and is being given appropriate attention by the Center. We will review the Center's progress in implementing our recommendations in our next audit. Mr. Mark Krell, the Department's Chief Internal Auditor, provided the responses to our recommendations. AUDITOR'S OPINION We conducted a compliance audit of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We also performed certain agreed upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our single audit of the entire Department. Financial statements for the Department are presented in the single audit report. _____________________________________ WGH:JW:pp
SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors were BDO Seidman, LLP. |