REPORT DIGEST
VANDALIA CORRECTIONAL
CENTER
LIMITED SCOPE COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2006 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 1 Total last audit 1 Repeated from last audit 0 Release Date: June 20, 2007
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full
Report is also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS
¨ The Center’s procedures for handling cash removed from debit card machines did not provide for an effective segregation of duties.
{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.} |
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
VANDALIA
CORRECTIONAL CENTER
LIMITED SCOPE COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For The Two
Years Ended June 30, 2006
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
Total Expenditures (All
Appropriated Funds)...... |
$31,096,790 |
$31,972,922 |
$32,410,293 |
Personal
Services......................................................
% of
Total Expenditures............................................ |
$21,052,233
67.7% |
$21,202,389
66.3% |
$20,556,030
63.4% |
Average
No. of Employees.................................
Average
Salary Per Employee...................................... |
407
$51,725 |
417
$50,845 |
437
$47,039 |
Other Payroll
Costs (FICA, Retirement).....................
% of Total Expenditures................................... |
$3,465,261
11.1% |
$4,843,756
15.2% |
$4,388,960
13.5% |
Student,
Member and Inmate Compensation....................
% of Total
Expenditures.......................................... |
$340,065
1.1% |
$263,284
0.8% |
$359,381
1.1% |
Contractual
Services..................................................
% of Total Expenditures................................... |
$4,004,627
12.9% |
$3,659,801
11.4% |
$4,278,202
13.2% |
Commodities.............................................................
% of
Total Expenditures....................................... |
$1,990,324
6.4% |
$1,763,791
5.5% |
$2,564,814
7.9% |
All Other Items..........................................................
% of Total Expenditures................................... |
$244,280
0.8% |
$239,901
0.8% |
$262,906
.9% |
Cost of Property and
Equipment........................... |
$37,018,282 |
$37,122,215 |
$37,108,140 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY
MEASURES (Not examined) |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2004 |
Average
Number of Inmates..................................... |
1,488 |
1,106 |
1,436 |
Ratio of
Correctional Officers to Inmates................... |
1 / 4.9 |
1 / 3.5 |
1 / 4.3 |
Cost Per Year
Per Inmate......................................... |
$20,890 |
$28,909 |
$22,562 |
Rated Inmate
Capacity.................................................. |
1,100 |
1,100 |
1,100 |
Approximate
Square Feet Per Inmate: |
28 |
30 |
38 |
CENTER WARDEN(S) |
During Examination Period: Mr. Steve
Mensing
Currently:
Mr. Steve Mensing |
The responsibilities of collecting, verifying, and depositing cash were performed by one individual. |
FINDING, CONCLUSION, ANDRECOMMENDATION LACK OF ADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES The Center’s procedures for handling cash removed from debit card machines did not provide for an effective segregation of duties. The responsibility of collecting cash from the machines, counting and verifying the cash received to reports generated from the machines, preparing of receipt forms and deposit slips, and depositing the funds collected were all performed by one individual. Center personnel had assigned responsibility to another
individual to agree the deposit amount to the receipt copy but failed to
realize that the machine totals were not being independently verified. (Finding
1, page 9) We
recommended the Center provide an adequate segregation of duties of debit
card cash receipts. An employee
independent of cash collection and depositing functions should be assigned
responsibility to reconcile debit card system sales reports to actual cash
received, deposited and postings to the general ledger. Management
indicated the recommendation had been implemented and the duty of reconciling
cash collected was reassigned to an employee not responsible to collect the
cash.
AUDITORS’ OPINION We
conducted a limited scope compliance examination of the Center as required by
the Illinois State Auditing Act. We
also performed certain agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accounting
records of the Center to assist with our financial audit of the entire
Department of Corrections. Financial
statements for the Department will be presented in a separate report. ____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General
WGH:AKS:pp
SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS
Our special assistant auditors for this examination were Glass and Shuffett, LTD. |