REPORT DIGEST

 

 

JACK MABLEY

DEVELOPMENTAL

CENTER

 

LIMITED SCOPE

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For the Two Years Ended:

June 30, 2005

 

Summary of Findings:

 

Total this audit                          3

Total last audit                          1

Repeated from last audit           1

 

Release Date:

June 13, 2006 

 

 

State of Illinois

Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND

AUDITOR GENERAL

 

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:

Office of the Auditor General

Attn:  Records Manager

Iles Park Plaza

740 E. Ash Street

Springfield, IL 62703

(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887

 

This Report Digest is also available on

the worldwide web at

http://www.state.il.us/auditor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

 

 

u      The Center did not complete annual performance evaluations in a timely manner.

 

u      The Center did not have adequate control over voucher processing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.}

 

 


                              JACK MABLEY DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER

                                         COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

                                    For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2005

 

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 2005

FY 2004

FY 2003

 

  Total Expenditures (All Appropriated Funds)

 

 

$10,713,532

 

$10,139,012

 

$10,072,208

     OPERATIONS TOTAL...........................

         % of Total Expenditures...................

        

         Personal Services...........................

$10,713,532

100%

 

$7,298,878

$10,139,012

100%

 

$6,957,436

$10,072,208

100%

 

$6,757,100

                % of Operations Expenditures........

                Average No. of Employees........

                Average Salary Per Employee....

 

68.1%

171

$42,683

68.6%

170

$40,926

67.1%

159

$42,497

 

         Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement)

                % of Operations Expenditures.....

$1,664,732

15.5%

$1,350,120

13.3%

$1,419,029

14.1%

         Contractual Services........................

                % of Operations Expenditures.....

$1,214,382

11.3%

$1,282,309

12.7%

$1,369,014

13.6%

         Commodities........................................

                % of Operations Expenditures...............

$439,020

4.1%

$437,999

4.3%

$417,824

4.1%

         All Other Items..............................

                % of Operations Expenditures.....

 

$96,520

1.0%

$111,148

1.1%

$109,241

1.1%

       Cost of Property and Equipment...............

$10,372,165

$9,139,152

$9,029,717

 

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES

FY 2005

FY 2004

FY 2003

  Average Number of Residents.......................

105

110

112

  Ratio of Employees to Residents.....................

1.63/1

1.55/1

1.42/1

  Cost Per Year Per Resident..........................

*

$129,694

$117,488

*The Department had not calculated at the close of fieldwork.

 

 

 

 

FACILITY DIRECTOR

     During Audit Period:  Sharon DeBerry

     Currently:  Sharon DeBerry

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23 out of 50 (46%) personnel files did not include annual performance evaluations based on the employee’s anniversary date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Center was not in compliance with voucher processing procedure

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

FAILURE TO PERFORM ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

 

      The Center did not complete employee performance evaluations or did not complete evaluations in a timely manner.

 

      Twenty-three personnel files out of fifty (46%) files tested did not include annual performance evaluations based on the employee’s anniversary date.

 

·        3 of 50 (6%) personnel files had no evaluations

·        12 of 50 (24%) evaluations were between 1 to 2 years late

·        3 of 50(6%) evaluations were between 2 to 3 years late

·        5 of 50 (10%) evaluations were between 3 to 4 years late. (Finding 1, page 9)

 

      Agency officials agreed with our recommendation to comply with the Illinois Administrative Code and perform timely employee evaluations and stated that performance evaluations will be completed and current by March 1, 2006.  Furthermore, the Center Director will ensure an objective for completing evaluations and each department will set up a tracking system to flag thirty days before the due date to ensure compliance.

 

INADEQUATE CONTROL OVER PROCESSING OF VOUCHERS

 

       The Center was not in compliance with voucher processing procedures.

 

      Based on our examination of fifty vouchers for the two-year period ended June 30, 2005, we noted the following instances of noncompliance:

 

·        2 of 50 vouchers tested (4%) were not approved or disapproved within 30 days after receipt of the vendor invoice.  Also, the vouchers were not paid within 60 days of receipt by the Comptroller’s Office.  One voucher for medical supplies totaling $1,479 was approved 69 days after receipt of the vendor invoice (39 days late).  Accrued interest of less than $50 was due, for which the vendor did not request to be paid.  One voucher for nursing services totaling $8,278 was approved 271 days after receipt of the vendor invoice (241 days late).  Accrued interest of $614.64 was paid by the Center.

 

·        2 of 50 vouchers tested (4%) lacked supporting documentation.  Twenty-five of the fifty vouchers tested were associated with contractual agreements and did not require bids and/or quotes.  Twenty-five vouchers were not associated with contractual agreements and Center practice is to obtain three bids or quotes from prospective vendors for these types of purchases.  Twenty-three vouchers had the appropriate supporting documentation and two did not.  One voucher totaling $2,516 was for personal hygiene products.  One voucher totaling $1,479 was for medical supplies. (Finding 2, pages 10-11)

 

            The Agency agreed with our recommendation to comply with the Illinois Administrative Code, Prompt Payment Act, and good business practice to ensure that invoices are properly bid, approved, and paid within the required time frame.

 

OTHER FINDING

 

         The remaining finding dealt with inadequate control over locally held funds.  We will review the progress toward implementation of all our recommendations during our next audit.

 

AUDITORS’ OPINION

 

     We conducted a compliance examination of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act.  This was a limited scope compliance examination.  The Center’s accounting records will be covered by the audit of the entire Department of Human Services.  Financial statements for the Department will be presented in that report.

 

 

____________________________________

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

 

WGH:KMC:drh

 

SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS

 

      Our special assistant auditors were Clifton Gunderson LLP.