REPORT DIGEST
DRYCLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE TRUST FUND COUNCIL OF ILLINOIS
COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION For the Year Ended: June 30, 2006 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 2 Total last audit 0 Repeated from last audit 0 Release Date: April 24, 2007
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full
Report are also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS
·
The Council did not enforce statutory timeframes for
reimbursement requests. ·
The Council did not adopt rules prescribing record
retention requirements for drycleaning facilities. {Receipts, Disbursements
and Activity Measures are summarized on the next page.} |
DRYCLEANER
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE
TRUST
FUND COUNCIL OF ILLINOIS
COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
STATISTICS |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
DRYCLEANER
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TRUST FUND RECEIPTS: License Fees Collected............................................... Solvent Taxes Collected.............................................. Insurance Premium Collected...................................... Late Payment Fees and Miscellaneous......................... Net Fees Collected for Council............................. Interest Income........................................................... Net Receipts EXPENDITURES: Contractual Services................................................... Travel......................................................................... Refunds...................................................................... Grants and Awards (Claims Payments)........................ Total Disbursements.............................................. |
$1,253,957 1,063,868 1,119,800 44,828 $3,482,453 178,958 $3,661,411 |
$1,340,403 1,074,820 1,185,848 52,886 $3,653,957 124,339 $3,778,296 $4,808,694 |
The above information was obtained from agency
and Comptroller records and includes that portion of the receipts reported by
the Illinois Department of Revenue and the Office of the Treasurer. License fees and solvent taxes collected are
reported net of a 4% collection fee charged by the Department of Revenue.
ACTIVITY MEASURES
(Not Examined) |
FY 2006 |
FY
2005
|
License applications
received............................................ |
1,311 |
1,345 |
Licenses issued................................................................. |
1,288 |
1,312 |
Insurance
applications received......................................... |
791 |
872 |
Insurance policies
issued................................................... |
784 |
848 |
Total eligible claims
filed.................................................... |
656 |
494 |
Total eligible claims
closed................................................ |
88 |
41 |
Cost per eligible
claim filed................................................ |
$430 |
$585 |
COUNCIL CHAIRMAN |
During Audit Period: John
Polak Currently: John Polak |
For 71% of
vouchers tested, billings were submitted 2 to 1,008 days late Rules did not
prescribe requirements for record retention by drycleaning facilities |
INTRODUCTION
The Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund Council of
Illinois (Council) oversees the licensure of all drycleaning facilities in
the State of Illinois. The Council
also reimburses drycleaner facilities for costs of remedial action for
solvent releases, which occurred in fiscal years 1998 through 2006. The Council offers insurance to facilities
to insure against solvent release cleanup costs subsequent to fiscal year
2006. The Council has contracted with
a third party administrator to conduct daily operations and fiscal and
administrative duties, under the oversight of the Council.
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS FAILURE TO ENFORCE STATUTORY TIMEFRAMES FOR PAYMENT REQUESTS The
Council did not require owners and operators of drycleaning facilities to
submit invoices and bills within 30 days of completion of remediation work as
required by statute. We noted 25 of
35 (71%) vouchers tested, totaling $413,893, paid billings that were
submitted 2 to 1,008 days late. The
Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund Act (Act) states that claimants
are subject to limitations on reimbursement, including a requirement that all
invoices and bills for remediation work shall be submitted not later than 30
days after the work has been performed (415 ILCS 135/40(f)(6). (Finding 1, Page 9) We
recommended the Council enforce the requirement that invoices and necessary
documentation be submitted timely as required by the Act or seek legislative
remedy to the statutory requirement. Council
responded that a legislative remedy would be sought to eliminate the
statutory requirement. FAILURE TO ADOPT RULES REGARDING THE RETENTION OF RECORDS The
Council did not adopt statutorily required rules prescribing record retention
requirements for drycleaning facilities.
The Council licensed 1,288 drycleaning facilities and issued 784
insurance policies during fiscal year 2006.
The
Act requires the Council to adopt rules prescribing requirements for the
retention of records by an owner or operator of a drycleaning facility and
the periods for which the records must be retained. (Finding 2, Page 11) We
recommended the Council adopt rules regarding record retention or seek
legislative remedy to the statutory requirement. Council
representatives responded that they would begin the process to adopt rules to
further clarify the record retention requirements. AUDITORS' OPINION
We conducted a compliance examination of the Drycleaner Environmental
Response Trust Fund Council of Illinois as required by the Illinois State
Auditing Act. We have not audited any
financial statements of the Council for the purpose of expressing an opinion
because the agency does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial
statements. ___________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:LW:pp AUDITORS ASSIGNED
This examination was conducted by staff of the Office of the
Auditor General. |