REPORT
DIGEST ILLINOIS EDUCATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2005
Summary of
Findings: Total this audit 4 Total last audit 1 Repeated from last audit 0 Release Date:
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park
Plaza 740 E. Ash
Street Springfield, IL
62703 (217)
782-6046 or TTY (888)
261-2887
This Report Digest is
also available on the worldwide web
at http://www.state.il.us/auditor
|
SYNOPSIS ¨ The Board made payments for efficiency initiative billings from improper line item appropriations. ¨ The Board did not timely hold fair share hearings, issue recommendation decisions and orders, or make fair share payments. ¨ The Board did not maintain adequate controls over personal services.
{Expenditures and
Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse
page.} |
ILLINOIS EDUCATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD
COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2005
EXPENDITURE
STATISTICS |
FY
2005 |
FY
2004 |
FY
2003 |
Total
Expenditures (All Appropriated
Funds)...
|
$1,231,435 |
$1,319,649 |
$1,657,916 |
OPERATIONS
TOTAL...........................
% of Total
Expenditures...................
|
$1,231,435 100% |
$1,319,649 100% |
$1,657,916 100% |
Personal Services...........................
% of Operations Expenditures........
Average No. of Employees...........
|
$896,430 16 |
$1,009,383 76.5% 16 |
$1,153,785 23 |
Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement)
% of Operations Expenditures........ |
$209,534 17.0% |
$167,927 12.7% |
$248,122 15.0% |
Contractual Services........................
% of Operations Expenditures........ |
$61,328 5.0% |
$96,293 7.3% |
$177,318 10.7% |
Electronic Data Processing................
% of Operations Expenditures...........
|
$4,451 0.4% |
$2,053 0.2% |
$2,131 0.1% |
Equipment....................................
% of Operations Expenditures...........
|
$12,728 1.0% |
$2,502 0.2% |
$20,090 1.2% |
All Other Operations Items................
% of Operations Expenditures........
|
$46,964 3.8% |
$41,491 3.1% |
$56,470 3.4% |
Cost of Property
and Equipment...............
|
$435,743 |
$461,585 |
$523,446 |
SELECTED
ACTIVITY MEASURES (Not
Examined) |
FY
2005 |
FY
2004 |
FY
2003 |
Representation
Cases Filed...........................
|
133 |
89 |
95 |
Unfair Labor
Practice Cases Processed............
|
357 |
354 |
357 |
AGENCY
DIRECTOR(S) |
During Audit
Period: Victor
Blackwell Currently:
Victor Blackwell |
The Board made payments for efficiency initiative billings from improper line item appropriations
Efficiency initiative payments
totaled $10,519
Three of 3 (100%) consolidated cases reviewed had hearings held 123 to 178 days after the last day for filing an objection
Seven of 10 (70%) vouchers tested involving 144 individual cases finalized by the Board were processed from 133 to 798 days after the Final Order was issued, and no documentation was maintained to substantiate the delays
Employee
evaluations were not timely conducted
Timekeeping discrepancies
were noted for two of 7 employees tested
Employees arrived after
their starting times and no leave slips were submitted
|
INTRODUCTION
The Illinois Educational Labor Relations
Board was created on January 1, 1984 to administer the Illinois Education
Labor Relations Act (115 ILCS 5/1 et seq.). The Board consists of a chairman
and four members appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of
the Senate. The Board has
jurisdiction over collective bargaining matters between educational
employees and public school educational employers. The Board’s primary
responsibilities under the Act are to process representation petitions
including conducting elections, to process unfair labor practice charges,
and to process mediation/arbitration requests.
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
EFFICIENCY INITIATIVE
PAYMENTS The Board made payments for efficiency initiative billings from improper line item appropriations.
Public Act 93-0025, in part, outlines a program for efficiency initiatives to reorganize, restructure and reengineer the business processes of the State. The State Finance Act details that the amount designated as savings from efficiency initiatives implemented by the Department of Central Management Services (CMS) shall be paid into the Efficiency Initiatives Revolving Fund. “State agencies shall pay these amounts…from the line item appropriations where the cost savings are anticipated to occur.” (30 ILCS 105/6p-5)
Three billings to the Board from CMS for savings from efficiency initiatives totaled $10,519. We found that the Board made payments for these billings not from line item appropriations where the cost savings were anticipated to have occurred but from line items where Board staff reported they had available funds. The Board used contractual services appropriations to pay the billings in both fiscal years. (Finding 1, pages 9 – 10)
We recommended that the Board only make payments for efficiency initiative billings from line item appropriations where savings would be anticipated to occur. Further, the Board should seek an explanation from CMS as to how savings levels were calculated, or otherwise arrived at, and how savings achieved or anticipated impact the Board’s budget.
The Board stated they complied with the directives of CMS and disbursed funds within the required time specified by CMS. The amount of the expenditures was not anticipated in the budget, consequently, the contractual services appropriation had to be used to pay for the initiative savings. The Board stated that they would contact CMS to substantiate the amount of savings.
UNTIMELY PROCESSING OF FAIR SHARE CASES AND PAYMENTS
The Board did not timely hold fair share hearings, issue Recommended Decisions and Orders, or make fair share payments. We noted the following:
· Three of 3 (100%) consolidated cases reviewed had hearings held 123 to 178 days after the last day for filing an objection. In addition, the Recommended Decisions and Orders were issued 232 to 315 days after the close of the record. The Illinois Educational Labor Relations Rules and Regulations (80 IL Admin Code 1125.80) states that the hearing shall commence no later than 60 days after an objection is filed. In addition, a Recommended Decision and Order shall be issued within 60 days of the close of record, unless additional time (up to 30 days) is required due to the length of the record and/or the complexity of the issues involved. Payment for the three cases had not been made as of the end of fieldwork.
· Seven of 10 (70%) vouchers tested involving 144 individual cases finalized by the Board were not processed for payment in a timely manner. The decisions included fair share disbursements of approximately $36,835, which includes accrued interest. The vouchers were processed from 133 to 798 days after the Final Order was issued, and no documentation was maintained to substantiate the delays. (Finding 2, pages 11-12)
We
recommended the Board hold hearings and issue Recommended Decisions and
Orders in accordance with their rules and regulations. We further recommended that the
Board implement controls to expedite fair share payments. The Board
acknowledged that there were delays in the hearing process, issuance
of the ALJ Recommended Decision and Order and processing of vouchers
pursuant to the Fair Share Hearings. The Board stated that they have
implemented new directives to expedite the hearing process and issuance of
the decisions in fair share cases. INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER PERSONAL
SERVICES The Board did not have adequate controls over personal services. We noted the following:
· The Board did not timely conduct annual performance evaluations for 16 of 16 (100%) of employees during FY 04 and FY 05. Employee evaluations were performed between 7 and 220 days late. In addition, there was no record of an annual evaluation for one employee during the past two years, and six employees had not received an FY05 evaluation as of the end of fieldwork. The Board’s Employee Handbook states that an employee’s performance is to be evaluated at least annually.
· Timekeeping discrepancies were noted for two of 7 (29%) employees tested when reviewing travel vouchers for top travelers. The travel vouchers showed the employees leaving their homes for business related travel between 1 and 4.5 hours later than their assigned work hours on 10 days in FY04 and between 1 and 5.5 hours late on 13 days in FY05. In addition, one FY04 travel voucher showed the employee also returned home 2.5 hours early. No itineraries were submitted and the time sheets submitted for the corresponding days showed the employee to be in the office or on travel status during the Board’s business hours. The Board’s Employee Handbook states that official office hours are 8:30 to 5:00, Monday through Friday. Employees are required to work at their post of duty or in the field. Any other arrangements require prior written approval. The rules further state that those employees who are on travel status or perform work outside of the office must furnish a copy of their itinerary if they are out of the office for more than 2 hours to the receptionist and the Office Manager each Monday for that week.
· Two of 10 (20%) employees tested during an auditor’s field visit arrived approximately 1 hour after their official starting times, but no leave time was taken and their timesheets reflected a full day’s work. In addition, 2 of 10 (20%) of employees who were absent during the field visit completed leave slips for vacation time 6 and 16 days after the time was taken. The Board’s Employee Handbook requires employees to arrive at work on time and notify the timekeeper within one hour of the scheduled starting time if they are absent or late for any reason. The Handbook also states that approval for vacation time must be granted in advance. (Finding 3, pages 13-14)
We recommended the Board conduct performance evaluations annually as required by policy, implement appropriate controls to monitor employee working hours including when an employee is on travel status, and obtain prior approval for employee leave time when required.
The Board acknowledged that the FY04 and FY05 evaluations were not done in a timely manner, and stated that most of the delays resulted from the layoff of the Chief Personnel Officer in FY04. The Board stated that they have issued notice to all Managers to process all outstanding evaluations and maintain timely production of evaluations in the future.
OTHER FINDING
The remaining finding was less significant and is reportedly being given attention by the Board. We will review the Board’s progress towards implementing our recommendations during the next examination period.
Victor Blackwell, Executive Director, provided responses to our findings and recommendations.
AUDITORS’ OPINION
We conducted a compliance examination of the Board as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We have not audited any financial statements of the Board for the purpose of expressing an opinion because the agency does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial statements.
____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General
WGH:GSR:pp
AUDITORS ASSIGNED
The examination was conducted by staff of the Office of the Auditor General.
|