REPORT DIGEST ILLINOIS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2007 Summary of Findings: Total this audit 3 Total last audit 6 Repeated from last audit 1 Release Date: February 20, 2008
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full
Report is also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS ¨ The Agency did not provide the auditors or the Office of the State Comptroller with accurate Grant/Contract accounting reports. ¨ The Agency did not reconcile their records to the Office of the State Comptroller in a timely fashion. ¨ The Agency did not inspect radiation installations and sources in a timely manner.
{Expenditures and Activity
Measures are summarized on the next page.} |
ILLINOIS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGENCY
COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For
the Two Years Ended June 30, 2007
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2007 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
Total Expenditures (All Funds)................ |
$151,388,242 |
$139,707,261 |
$105,273,939 |
OPERATIONS TOTAL......................... % of Total Expenditures..................... |
$117,450,730 77.58% |
$130,127,554 93.14% |
$99,791,865 94.79% |
Personal Services............................... % of Operations Expenditures........ Average No. of Full-time Employees |
$13,062,140 27.55% 233 |
$13,662,143 11.03% 239 |
$13,471,586 45.68% 250 |
Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement). % of Operations Expenditures....... |
$4,514,758 5.20% |
$4,473,392 1.71% |
$5,580,405 10.71% |
Contractual Services....................... % of Operations Expenditures...... |
$2,743,264 14.53% |
$2,897,030 3.20% |
$1,413,327 6.16% |
All Other Operations Items.............. % of Operations Expenditures...... |
$97,130,568 52.72% |
$109,094,989 84.06% |
$79,326,547 37.45% |
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL % of Total Expenditures...................... |
$0 0% |
$0 0% |
$436,600 .42% |
GRANTS AND REFUNDS TOTAL.......... % of Total Expenditures..................... |
$33,653,825 22.23% |
$9,330,170 6.68% |
$3,760,434 3.57% |
NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS............ % of Total Expenditures.......................... |
$283,687 .19% |
$249,537 .18% |
$1,285,040 1.22% |
Cost of Property and
Equipment........... |
$44,149,000 |
$41,842,000 |
$24,882,000 |
AGENCY DIRECTOR |
During Audit Period: William C. Burke (7/1/05 to 3/15/07), Andrew Velasquez III (3/16/07 to
current) Currently: Andrew
Velasquez III |
Inaccurate accounting information provided $70,000 understatement
$756,000 incorrectly reported Expenditures overstated by $94,000
Estimated receipts overstated by $128,000
Receivables overstated by $139,000 Reimbursable costs overstated by $128,000
Revenues overstated by $128,000
Agency agreed
with auditor recommendations Agency cash
balances were not reconciled to State Comptroller reports Agency agrees
with auditor recommendation
1,258 radiation
installation inspections were overdue
Agency accepts
auditor recommendation |
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, ANDRECOMMENDATIONS
INCORRECT FINANCIAL REPORTING The Agency did not provide the auditors or the Office of the State Comptroller with complete and accurate accounting information for grants and contracts (SCO-563 Forms). Upon initial
review of the SCO-563 Forms provided by Agency personnel, the auditors noted
the following errors: · Reporting for one fund did not include receipts and expenditures for one federal program, resulting in an understatement of $70,000 for total reimbursable costs and current year revenue for the federal program. · In two funds, the Agency recorded receipts, expenditures, and payables using an incorrect CFDA number. · The Agency incorrectly reported amounts in the wrong column for one fund resulting in an overstatement of $756,000 for current year refunds, current year receivables and unavailable deferred revenue, as well as an understatement of $756,000 for subrecipients and current year revenue. · Expenditures in one fund were overstated by $94,000. · Receipts in one fund were overstated by $11,000. · Estimated receipts in two funds were overstated by $128,000. · Current year receivables in three funds were overstated $139,000. · In four funds, the amounts reported as subrecepients on the SCO-563 Form did not agree to the Agency’s detailed accounting records. The difference was $3,211,000. · Total reimbursable costs in two funds were overstated by $128,000. · Current year revenues in two funds were overstated by $128,000. We recommended the Agency comply with SAMS Procedures to ensure accurate financial information is reported to the Office of the State Comptroller. We further recommended the Agency review its current process for the preparation and review of the SCO-563 Forms and allocate the resources necessary to ensure a thorough review of the SCO-563 Forms by personnel possessing the appropriate skills and knowledge. (Finding 1, pages 8-9) Agency officials accepted our recommendations and stated that they have begun the review of current processes for preparation and review of the SCO-563 Forms. They will increase staff training and begin to breakdown CFDA expenditures on a quarterly basis which will allow for review and corrections where needed before completion of a final document that will be forwarded to the Office of the Comptroller. UNTIMELY RECONCILIATION OF AGENCY RECORDS TO THE STATE COMPTROLLER’S REPORTS The Agency did not perform timely reconciliations of their records to the Office of the State Comptroller records. The auditors noted the following reconciliations were not performed timely: · The Agency did not perform a reconciliation between Agency expenditures and the Office of the State Comptroller’s Monthly Appropriations Status Report for 1 of 12 (8.3%) months during fiscal year 2006 and 2 of 12 (16.7%) months during fiscal year 2007 in a timely manner. In addition, one monthly reconciliation for one fund during fiscal year 2006 could not be provided by the Agency. ·
The Agency did not perform a reconciliation between
cash receipts collected by the Agency and the Office of the State
Comptroller’s Monthly Revenue Report for 6 of 12 (50%) months during fiscal
year 2006 and 3 of 12 (25%) months during fiscal year 2007 in a timely
manner. · The Agency did not perform a reconciliation between the Agency’s cash balance and the Office of the State Comptroller’s Monthly Cash Report. For fiscal year 2007, the Agency was unable to provide reconciliations to the Monthly Cash Reports for all funds administered by the Agency. For fiscal year 2006, the Agency was unable to provide 12 of 12 (100%) reconciliations for three funds, 11 of 12 (92%) reconciliations for one fund, 3 of 12 (25%) reconciliations for one fund, and 1 of 12 (8%) reconciliations for one fund. We recommended the Agency comply with
SAMS and perform monthly reconciliations in a timely manner. (Finding 2, pages 10-11) Agency officials accepted our
recommendation and stated that expenditure and revenue reconciliations have
been assigned to an Account Technician II within the newly established Accounting
and Fee Compliance Section within the Bureau of Finance. Reconciliations of cash fund balances have
been assigned to the Section Manager of the Federal Section within the Bureau
of Finance. UNTIMELY INSPECTION OF RADIATION INSTALLATIONS AND RADIATION SOURCES The Agency did not perform inspections of radiation installations and sources in a timely manner. The Agency is responsible for inspecting over 11,000 radiation installations. During review of inspection records, auditors determined that as of June 30, 2007, the inspection of 1,258 radiation installations (11%) were overdue for inspection. We noted 994 radiation installation inspections (79%) were less than six months late and less than 2% of the radiation installation inspections were over one year late. We recommended the Agency comply with the Radiation Protection Act of 1990 by providing adequate resources to complete inspections of radiation installations and radiation sources with the required intervals. (Finding 3, pages 12-13) Agency officials accepted our recommendation and stated that the Agency will continue to work with Agency inspectors to increase their efficiency.
AUDITORS’ OPINION
We
conducted a compliance examination of the Agency as required by the Illinois
State Auditing Act. We have not
audited any financial statements of the Agency for the purpose of expressing
an opinion because the Agency does not, nor is it required to, prepare
financial statements. ____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor
General WGH:TLD:pp SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS De Raimo
Hillger & Ripp were our special assistant auditors for this examination. |