REPORT DIGEST
ILLINOIS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2009
Summary of Findings:
Total this audit: 17
Total last audit : 3
Repeated from last audit: 2
Release Date: March 25, 2010
State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a copy of the Report contact:
Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703
(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887
This Report Digest and the Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov
SYNOPSIS
• The Agency
did not provide the auditors or the Office of the State Comptroller with
accurate Grant/Contract accounting reports.
• The Agency
did not reconcile their records to the Office of the State Comptroller records
in a timely fashion.
• The Agency
lacked proper segregation of duties in the processing of receipts, receivables
and revenues.
• The Agency
did not have adequate controls over receipts and refunds.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
INCORRECT FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Agency
did not provide the auditors or the Office of the State Comptroller with
complete and accurate accounting information for grants and contracts (SCO-563 Accounting Forms).
Upon
initial review of the SCO-563 Accounting Forms
provided by Agency personnel, the auditors noted the following errors:
• Reporting
for one fund did not include receipts and expenditures for one federal program,
resulting in an understatement of $137,179 and current year revenue for the
program.
• In one
fund, the amounts reported as subrecipients did not
agree to the Agency’s detailed accounting records. The difference in
expenditures was $5,842.
• In one
fund, the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
numbers for ten programs were not correctly identified. The total expenditure
amounts of these programs were $16,061,000.
We
recommended the Agency comply with the Office of the State Comptroller’s
procedures to ensure accurate financial information is reported. Further, the Agency should review its current
process for the preparation and review of the accounting reports and allocate
the resources necessary to ensure a thorough review and timely submission of
information to the Office of the Comptroller.
(Finding 1, pages 11-12)
Agency
officials accepted our recommendations and stated that although they do not have
procedural control over the completion of the Agency’s GAAP package, they will
continue to work with Shared Services to ensure the annual GAAP package is
completed in a timely manner.
UNTIMELY RECONCILIATION OF AGENCY RECORDS TO THE STATE
COMPTROLLER’S REPORTS
The Agency
did not perform timely reconciliations of their records to the Office of the
State Comptroller records. The auditors
noted the following reconciliations were not performed timely:
• The Agency
did not perform a reconciliation between Agency expenditures and the Office of
the State Comptroller’s Monthly Appropriations Status Report for 4 of 12 (33%)
months during fiscal year 2009 and 1 of 12 (8%) months during fiscal year 2008
in a timely manner. In addition, four
monthly reconciliations for one fund during fiscal year 2009 and for one month
of 2008 could not be provided by the Agency.
• The Agency
did not perform a reconciliation between cash receipts collected by the Agency
and the Office of the State Comptroller’s Monthly Revenue Report for 4 of 12
(33%) months during fiscal year 2009 and 2 of 12 (17%) months during fiscal
year 2008 in a timely manner. In addition, the reconciliation of one fund’s
balance for one month in each of fiscal years 2009 and 2008 was performed using
an incorrect Comptroller’s Report balance.
• The Agency
did not perform a reconciliation between the Agency’s
cash balance and the Office of the State Comptroller’s Monthly Cash
Report. For fiscal years 2009 and 2008,
the Agency was unable to provide reconciliations to the Monthly Cash Reports
for all funds administered by the Agency.
We
recommended the Agency comply with the Office of the State Comptroller
procedures and perform monthly reconciliations in a timely manner. (Finding 2, pages 13-14)
Agency
officials accepted our recommendation and stated they will work with Shared
Services to complete reconciliations in a timely manner.
INADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES
The Agency
lacked proper segregation of duties in the processing of receipts, receivables
and revenues.
During our
review of internal controls we noted the same individual may receive and stamp
checks, make deposits into the State Treasury, approve Receipt Deposit
Transmittal forms, and make any adjustments required to agency books upon
reconciliations to the Office of the State Comptroller records. In addition,
the individual involved in the billing process is also responsible for
maintaining and reporting of accounts receivable balances as well as
investigating billing disputes.
We
recommended the Agency revise its policies and practices to ensure proper
segregation of duties. (Finding 4, pages
17-18)
Agency
officials accepted our recommendation and will request additional personnel to
enable proper segregation of duties. Until such time when personnel can be
added, the Agency will actively review other means to adequately segregate the
duties of this section.
INADEQUATE INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER CASH RECEIPTS AND REFUNDS
The Agency
did not have adequate controls over receipts and refunds.
We tested 50
receipts and 21 refunds, totaling $43,316,956, which were directly received by
the agency and noted:
• The
timeliness of deposits could not be determined for certain refunds and receipts
tested totaling $296,952 due to lack of documentation of date received.
• The Receipt
Deposit Transmittals (RDTs) totaling $1,873,245
contained incorrect State Comptroller source codes. Further, a total of
$3,852,510 in federal receipts were coded incorrectly.
We
recommended the Agency strengthen its controls over cash receipts and refunds
by date stamping deposits upon receipt and submitting complete and accurate RDTs to the Office of the State Comptroller in a timely
manner. (Finding 7, pages 24-25)
Agency
officials accepted our recommendations and stated that the incorrect source
codes have been corrected by updating the code at the Office of the State
Comptroller.
AUDITORS’ OPINION
We
conducted a compliance examination of the Agency as required by the Illinois
State Auditing Act. We have not audited
any financial statements of the Agency for the purpose of expressing an opinion
because the Agency does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial
statements.
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General
WGH:MKL:pp
SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS
De Raimo Hillger
& Associates were our special assistant auditors for this examination.