REPORT DIGEST

EAST ST. LOUIS FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY

FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT

For the Two Years Ended:

June 30, 2000

Summary of Findings:

Total this audit 4

Total last audit 2

Repeated from last audit 1

 

Release Date:
February 28, 2001

Logo.gif (1870 bytes)

State of Illinois

Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND

AUDITOR GENERAL

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:
Office of the Auditor General
Attn: Records Manager
Iles Park Plaza
740 E. Ash Street
Springfield, IL 62703

(217)782-6046 or TDD (217) 524-4646

This Report Digest is also available on
the worldwide web at
http://www.state.il.us/auditor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

 

 

  • The Authority did not have adequate segregation of duties in the areas of equipment and cash receipts.
  • The Authority did not comply with the Public Funds Investment Act.

 

 

 

{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.}

 

EAST ST. LOUIS FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY
FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For the Two Years Ended June 30, 2000

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 2000

FY 1999

Total Expenditures
Locally Held Funds Total

% of Total Expenditures

Appropriated Funds Total

% of Total Expenditures

Expenditures from the Lump Sum
Appropriations:
Personal Services
Contractual Services
Travel
Commodities
Printing
Equipment
Electronic Data Processing
Telecommunications
Total Expenditures

Cost of Property and Equipment

$243,896
$9,328

4%

$234,568

96%


$ 184,046
29,007
6,656
2,739
204
7,854
0
4,062
$234,568

$92,158

$247,367
$15,061

6%

$232,306

94%


$172,780
42,359
1,421
4,293
21
8,007
55
3,370
$232,306

$94,950

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES

FY 2000

FY 1999
Total Loan Repayments

Loan Repayments - Principal
Loan Repayments - Interest

$460,017

335,975
124,042

$368,014

251,342
116,672

City Loan Still Outstanding

$1,450,308

$1,786,284

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

FY 2000

FY 1999
Number of Authority Employees

5

5

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
During Audit Period: Mr. R. Bruce Patterson (7/1/98 - 8/31/98), Mr. W. Kenneth Gearhart (effective 9/1/98)
Currently: Mr. W. Kenneth Gearhart

 

 

 

 

 

Duties were not adequately segregated in the areas of equipment and cash receipts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Written investment policy needed to ensure higher rate of return on investments

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES

The Authority did not have adequate segregation of duties in the areas of equipment and cash receipts. One employee was responsible for recording equipment expenditures and maintaining property records. During seventeen months of the audit period, the employee was also responsible for recording cash receipts and performing monthly reconciliations. This increases the risk that errors or irregularities could occur and not be found in the normal course of operations.

We recommended the Authority properly segregate duties in order to maintain an effective internal control over the record keeping and accounting duties concerned with asset custody and physical control over assets. (Finding 1, page 12)

The Authority agreed with our recommendation and states it has implemented procedures which will segregate responsibilities to enhance internal controls.

NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC FUNDS INVESTMENT ACT

The Authority did not comply with the Public Funds Investment Act by not investing excess funds in order to achieve a higher rate of return or by having a written investment policy. The Authority's Corporate Savings Account at June 30, 2000 had a $1,030,073 balance of which approximately $500,000 could have been invested in acceptable securities at a higher rate of return during the last three months of FY 00.

We recommended the Authority comply with statute and establish a written investment policy and ensure excess funds are invested in acceptable securities to achieve the highest rate of return. (Finding 3, page 14)

The Authority agreed with the recommendation and transferred $700,000 from the Savings Account to the Investment Account and established a written investment policy effective August 26, 2000.

OTHER FINDINGS

The other findings noted in our report were less significant and the Authority has responded that corrective action is in process. We will review the Authority’s progress towards the implementation of our recommendations in our next audit.

Mr. W. Kenneth Gearhart, Director, provided responses to our findings and recommendations.

AUDITORS’ OPINION

Our auditors state the financial statements of the East St. Louis Financial Advisory Authority as of and for the years ended June 30, 2000 and June 30, 1999 are fairly presented in all material respects.

____________________________________

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

WGH:GR:pp

AUDITORS ASSIGNED

Martin & Shadid were our special assistant auditors for this audit.