REPORT DIGEST GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY Financial Audit For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Release Date: June 23, 2021 FINDINGS THIS AUDIT: 1 CATEGORY: NEW -- REPEAT -- TOTAL Category 1: 1 -- 0 -- 1 Category 2: 0 -- 0 -- 0 Category 3: 0 -- 0 -- 0 TOTAL: 1 -- 0 -- 1 FINDINGS LAST AUDIT: 0 Category 1: Findings that are material weaknesses in internal control and/or a qualification on compliance with State laws and regulations (material noncompliance). Category 2: Findings that are significant deficiencies in internal control and noncompliance with State laws and regulations. Category 3: Findings that have no internal control issues but are in noncompliance with State laws and regulations. INTRODUCTION This digest covers the Governors State University’s (University) Financial Audit as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020. A separate digest covering the University’s Compliance Examination (including the Single Audit) for the year ended June 30, 2020 will be released under separate cover. SYNOPSIS • (20-01) The University did not have adequate internal control over reporting its census data and did not have a reconciliation process to provide assurance census data submitted to its pension and other postemployment benefits was complete and accurate. University did not perform an initial reconciliation of its census data University lacked procedures for eligibility to participate in SURS for F and J visas employees Former University F and J visas employees still within SURS need a review of their service credit Three of three (100%) employees tested had the start date of a leave of absence untimely reported and was determined the total potential impact to total service credit could be off by one to 3.5 years Five employees termination or rehire date(s) had been untimely reported and was determined the total potential impact to total service credit was off between 0.0 to 1.75 years University agreed with recommendation FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS INADEQUATE INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER CENSUS DATA The University did not have adequate internal control over reporting its census data and did not have a reconciliation process to provide assurance census data submitted to its pension and other postemployment benefits was complete and accurate. During testing, some of the more significant issues we noted include the following: * The University had not performed an initial complete reconciliation of its census data recorded by SURS and CMS to its internal records to establish a base year of complete and accurate census data. * The University lacked procedures to separately identify its new employees who held F and J visas to determine whether these employees were eligible to participate in SURS. Our review identified eight employees with start dates between 2011 and 2017 who could potentially have too much service credit, which would erroneously increase the State’s SURS-related pension liability. SURS’ records indicated many individuals initially employed at the University and then moved to other public universities and community colleges within SURS. As of the end of fieldwork, SURS officials were working to identify the population of potentially impacted participants across its employers for review to determine if the participant has received too much service credit. * We performed an analysis of transactions reported by the University to SURS during the census data accumulation period throughout Fiscal Year 2018, noting three of three (100%) employees with a departure on a leave of absence had the start date of the leave of absence untimely reported to SURS by the University. SURS determined the total potential impact to each of these employees’ total service credit was it could be off by one to 3.5 years. * As of the end of the census data accumulation year on June 30, 2018, we identified five employees where each employee’s associated termination or rehire date(s) had been untimely reported to SURS. SURS determined these errors resulted in the employees being misclassified between the active, retired, and inactive member categories within SURS. The total potential impact to each former employee's total service credit was it could be off between 0.0 and 1.75 years. (Finding 1, pages 70-74) We recommended the University implement controls to ensure census data events are timely and accurately reported to SURS and CMS. Further, we recommended the University work with SURS and CMS to develop an annual reconciliation process of its active members’ census data from its underlying records to a report from each plan of census data submitted to the plan’s actuary. Finally, we recommended the University work with SURS and other public universities and community colleges to identify employees initially hired by the University with a visa who had not met the Internal Revenue Service’s substantial presence test. University officials agreed with our recommendation. AUDITOR’S OPINION The auditors stated the financial statements of the University as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020, are fairly stated in all material respects. This financial audit was conducted by Borschnack, Pelletier & Co. JANE CLARK Division Director This report is transmitted in accordance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. FRANK J. MAUTINO Auditor General FJM:JGR