REPORT DIGEST

 

 

ILLINOIS STATE POLICE MERIT BOARD

 

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For the Two Years Ended:

June 30, 2008

 

Summary of Findings:

 

Total this audit                  3

Total last audit                  3

Repeated from last audit   1

 

 

 

Release Date:

February 26, 2009

 

 

 

State of Illinois

Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND

AUDITOR GENERAL

 

 

 

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:

Office of the Auditor General

Iles Park Plaza

740 E. Ash Street

Springfield, IL 62703

(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887

 

This Report Digest and the Full Report are also available on

the worldwide web at

http://www.auditor.illinois.gov

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

 

 

 

¨      The Board did not have adequate controls over its personal services function.   

 

¨      The Board failed to pay telecommunication invoices totaling $3,225 for Fiscal Year 2008, in effect exceeding its appropriation by this amount for the fiscal year. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.}

 

 

 

 


                                          ILLINOIS STATE POLICE MERIT BOARD

                                                   COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

                                              For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2008

 

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 2008

FY 2007

FY 2006

     Total Expenditures ...............................

 

$931,308

$818,860

$855,173

         Personal Services............................

           % of Total Expenditures..............

           Average No. of Employees..........

$406,745

44%

5

$322,096

39%

5

$304,000

36%

5

         Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement).....................................

           % of Total Expenditures..............

 

$97,784

11%

 

$61,356

8%

 

$46,546

5%

         Contractual Services........................

           % of Total Expenditures..............

$385,344

41%

$379,732

46%

$453,565

53%

         All Other Items........................................

           % of Total Expenditures

$41,435

4%

$55,676

7%

$51,062

6%

 

 

 

 

     Cost of Property and Equipment...........

$183,016

$241,745

$201,750

 

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES

(Not Examined)

 FY 2008

 FY 2007

FY 2006

Complaints against sworn officers.....................

 

Complaints settled without hearings...................

 

Complaints involving formal hearings.................

 

Complaints pending at year end........................

 

Pre-employment cards received........................

 

Applicants certified to a cadet class..................

 

Graduating applicants certified to class..............

 

*One class in FY08 will not graduate until FY09.

^Two classes in FY06 did not graduate until FY07.

9

 

5

 

2

 

9

 

2,497

 

122

 

*100

 

9

 

12

 

2

 

7

 

2,810

 

132

 

105

 

17

 

11

 

6

 

12

 

1,517

 

150

 

^0

 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

     During Audit Period:  James Seiber (through 12-31-07); Ronald P. Cooley (effective 1-1-08)

     Currently:  Ronald P. Cooley

 


 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lack of controls over personal services function

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Board exceeded its appropriation by $3,225

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 

INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER PERSONAL SERVICES

 

      The State Police Merit Board (Board) did not have adequate controls over its personal services function.  We noted the Board did not:

 

·        maintain time sheets in compliance with the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act;

·        exercise controls over employee attendance to ensure the employees’ work hours and benefit time were properly recorded and documented;

·        comply with Board rules in regards to compensatory time;

·        complete all sections of the Board’s Agency Workforce Report; and

·        conduct employee performance appraisals timely.

 

      We recommended the Board ensure timesheets are maintained in compliance with the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act and ensure Agency Workforce reports are properly completed.  We further recommended the Board strengthen controls to ensure employees’ work hours and benefit time are properly recorded and documented and perform appraisals timely for all employees.  (Finding 1, pages 8-10)

 

      Board officials agreed and stated as of January 1, 2009 the Board will implement procedures to bring the Board into compliance. 

 

NONPAYMENT OF COMMUNICATION REVOLVING FUND

 

      The Board failed to pay telecommunication invoices totaling $3,225 for Fiscal Year 2008, in effect exceeding its appropriation by this amount for the fiscal year.  During our testing, we noted the Board still owed the Department of Central Management Services (DCMS) communications revolving fund $3,225 after available funds had been used to pay fiscal year 2008 charges.  We also noted the Board transferred funds totaling $2,019 out of their telecommunication appropriation.  The Board transferred $1,284 to the personal services line items in late June and transferred $735 to the contractual services line item in August, which was the fiscal year 2008 lapse period.  If the Board had not transferred the funds and used the original amount appropriated to pay DCMS revolving fund the Board would have only owed DCMS approximately $1,206 as opposed to $3,225. 

 

      We recommended the Board timely process revolving fund invoices and initiate reductions in other line items to ensure sufficient funds to pay all expenditures.  (Finding 3, page 13)

 

            Board officials agreed and stated they will take measures to process revolving fund invoices in a timely manner. 

 

 

OTHER FINDING

 

      The other report finding pertaining to voucher processing weaknesses is reportedly being given attention by the Board.  We will review progress toward implementing our recommendation in our next examination.  

 

AUDITORS’ OPINION

 

      We conducted a compliance examination of the State Police Merit Board (Board) as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act.  We have not audited any financial statements of the Board for the purpose of expressing an opinion because the Board does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial statements.

 

 

____________________________________

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

 

WGH:JSC:pp

 

AUDITORS ASSIGNED

 

      The compliance examination was conducted by the Auditor General’s staff.