REPORT DIGEST

 

LEGISLATIVE PRINTING UNIT

 

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For the Two Years Ended:

June 30, 2009

 

Summary of Findings:

 

Total this audit                   1

Total last audit                   0

Repeated from last audit    0

 

 

Release Date:

January 14, 2010

 

 

 

 

State of Illinois

Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND

AUDITOR GENERAL

 

 

 

 

 

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:

Office of the Auditor General

Iles Park Plaza

740 E. Ash Street

Springfield, IL 62703

(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887

 

 

This Report Digest and the Full Report are also available on

the worldwide web at

http://www.auditor.illinois.gov

 

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

 

·        The Legislative Printing Unit did not exercise adequate control over the recording and reporting of State Property.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{Financial Information is summarized on the reverse page.}

 

 


 

 

 

LEGISLATIVE PRINTING UNIT

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2009

 

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 2009

FY 2008

FY 2007

Total Expenditures...........................................

 

      Personal Services....................................

            % of Operations Expenditures............

            Average No. of Employees................

           

      Other Payroll Costs.................................

            % of Operations Expenditures............

 

      Contractual Services................................

            % of Operations Expenditures............

 

Equipment........………………….

% of Operations Expenditures…

 

      All Other Operations Items......................

            % of Operations Expenditures............

 

 

$2,425,016

 

$1,313,240

54.1%

30

 

$426,273

17.6%

 

$210,907

8.7%

 

$239,145

9.9%

 

$235,451

9.7%

 

$2,393,501

 

$1,310,039

54.7%

29

 

$365,692

15.3%

 

$229,563

9.6%

 

$272,583

11.4%

 

$215,624

9.0%

 

$2,328,644

 

$1,263,588

54.3%

29

 

$289,772

12.4%

 

$226,012

9.7%

 

$304,957

13.1%

 

$244,315

10.5%

 

 

Cost of Property and Equipment......................

 

$4,682,723

 

$4,369,167

 

$3,966,367

 

 

 

 

 

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES

(Not Examined)

 

FY 2009

 

FY 2008

 

FY 2007

·        Total number of jobs completed ….............

·        Total number of impressions.......................

5,003

21,208,362

3,129

23,335,765

3,562

27,481,732

 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

During Audit Period:  Mr. John L. Rodems

Currently:  Mr. John L. Rodems

 

 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Additions totaling $397,500 not reported

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Additions totaling $34,067 recorded late

 

 

 

 


Locations of property differed from records

 

 


Trade-in allowance improperly deducted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Agency agreed with auditor recommendation

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 

INADEQUATE CONTROL OVER THE RECORDING AND REPORTING OF STATE PROPERTY

 

     The Legislative Printing Unit (LPU) did not exercise adequate control over the recording and reporting of State Property.  We noted the following:

 

·        LPU did not properly record the cost of an item acquired under an installment purchase agreement.  LPU recorded an addition to their property records for the acquisition of this item totaling $157,500.  However, the Office of the Comptroller (Comptroller) had determined the cost of this item to be $555,000.  As a result, the item’s value was understated on the LPU property records by $397,500, and LPU improperly understated additions on their Quarterly Report of State Property (C-15) for the corresponding quarter by $397,500. 

 

·        LPU did not timely record 5 of 23 (22%) equipment additions tested, totaling $34,067, on its property records. These items were recorded from 15 to 48 days late.  In addition, one item acquired prior to the current examination period was not added to the property records or tagged, and historical cost or value information for this item could not be located. 

 

·        For 5 of 25 (20%) items tested, the items were located within LPU; however, the physical locations differed from the locations specified in LPU’s records.

 

·        In addition, LPU did not properly record the value of an item acquired during the examination period.  LPU purchased the equipment item, which had a total cost of $8,600.  However, LPU deducted the trade-in allowance of $500 when recording the value of the equipment on LPU’s property records.  As a result, the item’s value was understated by $500, and LPU improperly understated additions on their C-15 for the corresponding quarter by $500 (Finding 1, pages 8-9)

 

    We recommended LPU strengthen controls over the recording and reporting of State property by ensuring all equipment is accurately and timely recorded on LPU’s property records.

 

    Agency officials agreed with our recommendation and stated they have taken corrective action to ensure that all future installment purchases are recorded in the proper manner on property control records in accordance with Comptroller rules.  Additionally, LPU stated they will ensure that all property acquired with trade-in allowances are properly valued on property control records and strengthen controls over equipment additions to ensure they are recorded in a timely manner and adjust physical locations of property items as they are moved from one location to another.

 

 

AUDITOR’S OPINION

 

     We conducted a compliance examination of the Legislative Printing Unit as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act.  We have not audited any financial statements of the Legislative Printing Unit for the purpose of expressing an opinion because the Legislative Printing Unit does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

____________________________________

                                 WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

 

 

 

WGH:CMD:pp

 

 

AUDITORS ASSIGNED

 

      The compliance examination was conducted by the Auditor General’s staff.