ILLINOIS LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT Summary of Findings:
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND To obtain a copy of the Report contact: This Report Digest is also available on |
|
ILLINOIS LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 1998
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
|
$3,556,434 $3,556,434
$540,603 $300,910 $241,902 $87,870 $191,743 $435,039 $629,111 |
$3,396,990 $3,396,990
$504,991 $306,841 $331,165 $0 $195,192 $289,685 $580,045 |
$3,229,169 $3,229,169
$472,777 $309,341 $279,966 $0 $218,496 $288,354 $538,997 |
SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES | FY 1998 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1996 |
|
26,402 |
25,071 |
25,823 |
AGENCY DIRECTOR | |||
During Audit Period: Arabel Alva Rosales Currently: Sam Panayotovich |
No written policy of authorization and accounting for equipment used externally
Documentation of approvals and effective dates of policy changes was lacking |
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS INADEQUATE CONTROL OVER FIXED ASSETS The Commission's internal controls over fixed assets were inadequate because there was no written policy on the authorization and accounting procedures for equipment assigned to employees for use outside of the Commission's office. Laptop and desktop computers and printers with costs totaling approximately $100,660 were assigned to personnel who routinely worked outside of the Commission's office. There was no equipment release form which would indicate justification or approval for on-location use of equipment, the terms and conditions of such use, and acknowledgment of receipt by the employee to which the equipment was assigned. Return of the equipment to the Commission was also not documented. This increased the risk of improper use or loss of state property. (Finding 98-1, pages 11-12) We recommended the Commission develop formal written policies and procedures for the release of equipment used externally including provisions to ensure accountability. Commission management agreed with our recommendation and stated they will implement procedures accordingly. INCOMPLETE DOCUMENTATION OF POLICY APPROVAL The Commission has developed an Administrative Review Process (ARP) Manual to provide written policies and procedures in the disposition of violations and assessment of fines. However, there was not formal documentation on file evidencing approval by the Commissioners when the provisions of the ARP Manual were implemented. The ARP Manual also did not specify the effective date of the provisions. Any changes and updates made on the manual did not undergo a formal approval process. The ARP Manual provides for a consistent application of procedures and encompasses the whole adjudication process. Without a formal approval process, the implementation of the provisions could be challenged and regarded as unauthorized. Changes and updates on the manual could not be traced because the effective dates of the provisions were not specified. (Finding 98-2, pages 13 - 14) We recommended the ARP Manual should be formally approved for implementation and effective dates should be indicated. Any changes or updates on any provision should undergo the same approval process. The Commission agreed to institute a sign off process for policy approval and to file the approvals with the master copy. OTHER FINDING The remaining finding is of lesser significance and is being given appropriate attention by the Commission. We will review progress toward implementation of our recommendations in our next audit. AUDITORS' OPINION Our auditors stated the Commission's financial statements for the Dram Shop Fund as of June 30, 1997 and June 30, 1998 were fairly presented.
WGH:ROQ:ak SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITOR Our special assistant auditors were the Bronner Group, Inc. |