REPORT DIGEST
MEDICAL DISTRICT
COMMISSION
FINANCIAL AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
Summary of Findings: Total this audit 9 Total last audit 4 Repeated from last audit 3
Release Date: May 20, 2008
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G.
HOLLAND
AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS
¨ The Commission did not have adequate controls over financial reporting. ¨ The Commission did not properly prepare accounting reports submitted to the State Comptroller. ¨ The Commission did not comply with required contracting procedures. ¨ The Commission did not remit unexpended proceeds from the sale of Commission property to the State Treasury for deposit into the Medical Center Commission Income Fund.
{Financial Information is summarized on the reverse page.} |
MEDICAL DISTRICT COMMISSION
FINANCIAL AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION
For The Year Ended June 30, 2007
STATEMENT
OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN NET ASSETS |
FY 2007 |
FY 2006 |
OPERATING
REVENUES Grants ........................................................................ Rental Income............................................................ Other Income............................................................. Total Operating
Revenues.............................. OPERATING EXPENSES Property Management and Development........... Grant Programs........................................................ Depreciation and Amortization............................. Total Operating Expenses............................... OPERATING (L0SS) INCOME.............................. NONOPERATING, REVENUES (EXPENSES) State Appropriations.............................................. Interest Income....................................................... Interest Expense...................................................... Capital Assets (Net gain/loss) |
$1,422,250 2,383,679 144,231 $
3,950,160 $5,506,023 1,262,197 833,822 $7,602,042 $ 176,425 1,346,789 (2,182,566) $( 659,352) $_______ $(4,311,234) |
$
1,535,795 2,257,362 321,958 $ 4,115,115 $ 3,687,311 1,097,001 635,265 $ 5,419,577
$(1,304,462) $
195,179 809,756 (926,386) $ 78,549 $ 289,210 $
(936,703) |
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS |
2007 FY 2007 |
FY 2006 |
ASSETS Cash and cash Equivalents................................... Investments............................................................. Notes and Accounts Receivable.......................... Other Assets........................................................... Capital Assets, Net of Depreciation.................... Total Assets...................................................... LIABILITIES Accounts Payable.................................................. Accrued Interest Payable...................................... Other Liabilities and Payables.............................. Line of Credit........................................................... Revenue Bonds Payable........................................ Total Liabilities.................................................. Invested in Capital Assets (net of debt)............. Restricted for Grants and Capital Projects.......... Unrestricted............................................................. Total Net Assets............................................. TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS |
$16,100,552 11,804,344 7,924,936 1,201,104 52,574,524 $89,605,460
$1,083,067 712,782 553,218 2,042,506 40,000,000 $44,391,573
$35,408,403 3,982,154 5,823,330 $45,213,887
$89,605,460 |
$
13,877,681
17,089,479
8,355,780 1,537,237 52,421,905 $
93,282,082 $ 891,409
871,281
726,039
1,268,232 $
40,000,000 $
43,756,961 $
31,924,875
7,194,553 10,405,693 $ 49,525,121 $ 93,282,082 |
EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR |
||
During Audit Period: Samuel Pruett Currently: Samuel Pruett |
Inadequate internal controls
Incorrect financial statement account
classifications
Unrecorded expenses
In an exchange of similar assets the
Commission deleted the assets exchanged but did not record the assets
acquired Land for which title and ownership had
passed were recorded as Construction in Progress instead of Land at June 30,
2007
The Commission did not properly prepare
accounting reports for timely submission to the Office of the State
Comptroller Failure to comply with competitive bidding requirements
Payments exceeded the contract maximums
Several contracts did not contain all required
certifications or clauses Unexpended proceeds of $8,152,049 were not remitted to
the State Treasury
Commission officials disagree
Auditor Comment |
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS INADEQUATE
CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING The Illinois Medical District Commission did
not have an adequate system of internal controls over
financial reporting to allow management or employees in the normal course of
performing their assigned functions to prevent or detect financial statement
misstatements in a timely manner. The
Commission did not record some transactions and did not properly record
several other transactions. As a
result, the Commission did not properly apply appropriate generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). During
our audit, we noted several problems, including the following:
·
Cash equivalents
totaling $7,093,090 included investments maturing beyond three months from
date of purchase, which should have been reported as investments. Investments totaling $11,003,361 included
amounts maturing within three months from the date of purchase which should
have been reported as cash equivalents.
·
Amortization
expense on intangibles totaling $469,036 was not recorded.
·
The Commission
did not adjust its records when it changed its plan to raze a building and
instead converted it to a revenue-generating asset. The building component of
$126,000 with cumulative depreciation expense of $38,850 was still recorded
as part of the original acquisition cost of land.
·
The Commission
acquired parcels of land through exchange of similar assets totaling
$248,211. The Commission recorded
these transactions by recognizing an expense and deleting the assets
exchanged, but did not record the assets acquired.
·
Architect fees
totaling $266,008 incurred during the year in constructing a building not yet
completed as of June 30, 2007 were recorded as Building and Building
Improvement instead of Construction in Progress.
·
Costs incurred
($142,502) in acquiring parcels of land for which title and ownership had not
been transferred to the Commission as of June 30, 2007 were recorded as
Construction in Progress instead of Prepaid Assets.
·
Costs of parcels
of land ($208,385) for which title and ownership had been transferred to the
Commission as of June 30, 2007 were recorded as Construction in Progress
instead of Land. (Finding 1, pages 12-16) Commission officials agreed with
our recommendation to comprehensively review their procedures to ensure that
the financial statements, including disclosures, are complete accurate, and
comply with generally accepted accounting principles. INACCURATE
AND UNTIMELY SUBMISSION OF GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP)
REPORTING PACKAGE The Illinois Medical District Commission did not
properly prepare accounting reports (GAAP Reporting Package) for timely
submission to the Office of the Comptroller. The Commission submitted an initial GAAP
package to the Comptroller’s Office on September 21,
2007, which included information for the financial statements. The Comptroller’s Office questioned
several accounts and requested numerous clarifications. Our analysis disclosed that the Commission
did not keep adequate records, schedules, or reconciliations to support the
initial GAAP submissions. At the
conclusion of our field work on January 5, 2008, the Commission had not yet finalized
a revised GAAP Package. (Finding 3,
pages 19-20) This issue was first reported in 2002. Commission officials agreed with
our recommendation to improves its procedures to ensure that accounting
records are appropriately and timely maintained so that schedules or
reconciliations to support the “GAAP Reporting Packages” can be prepared in
the future. (For previous Commission
response, see Digest Footnote #1) NONCOMPLIANCE
WITH REQUIRED CONTRACTING PROCEDURES The Illinois
Medical District Commission did not comply with certain contracting
procedures. During our testing of 22
contracts, we noted several problems, including the following: -
Two (9%) of 22 contracts totaling
$120,000 -
Four (18%) of 22 contracts awarded
totaling $245,000 -
Six (27%) of 22 contracts totaling $640,418
were not -
Two (9%) contracts paid from locally
held funds -
Seven (32%) of 22 contracts totaling
$817,218 did not reported in 2005. Commission
Officials agreed with our recommendations to ensure that contracts over
$5,000 (professional and artistic) and over $10,000 (all other) be filed with
the Comptroller; that an affidavit for Late Filing should be completed for
any contract liability not filed within thirty days of execution; and that
contract requirements and signatures, sole source justification, and
disclosure statements be obtained and published as required. (For previous Commission response, see
Digest Footnote #2) FAILURE TO REMIT
UNEXPENDED PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF COMMISSION PROPERTY INTO THE INCOME FUND
HELD IN THE STATE TREASURY The
Illinois Medical District Commission did not remit unexpended proceeds from
the sale of Commission property to the State Treasury for deposit into the
Medical Center Commission Income Fund. The Illinois Medical District Act
requires the Commission to remit to the State Treasury all moneys on hand
(originating from the sale of Commission property) as of June 30 in excess of
$350,000. During Fiscal Year 2004, the
Commission sold real property to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The proceeds from the sale totaled
$10,688,767. As of June 30, 2005, an
estimated $8,152,049 of those proceeds has not been expended or obligated and
the Commission did not remit these excess funds to the State Treasury. As of June 30, 2006, the unexpended
portion of these proceeds totaled $7,877,969, and the Commission had not yet
remitted any excess funds to the State Treasury. As of June 30, 2007, funds
in the amount of $4,000,000 were pledged as collateral for a $40 million bond
offering and pursuant to a Commission Resolution dated May 23, 2006, the
remainder of the funds were pledged as collateral for a $4,000,000 line of
credit with a bank. (Finding 8, pages 33-34)
This finding was first reported in
2005. We recommended the Commission remit
the excess moneys to the State Treasury for deposit into the Income Fund. Commission officials continue to
disagree with this finding and maintain their actions are consistent with the
Illinois Medical District Act. They stated the matter is pending before the
Illinois Attorney General and this should no longer be a finding as there
were not funds in excess of $350,000 at the close of fiscal year 2007 that
were either unexpended or not under contractual obligation. (For previous
Commission responses, see Digest Footnote #3) In an Auditor Comment, we stated
that the auditors continue to stand by the finding based on the same criteria
that was cited in the prior two audits.
We noted that under the statute, by October 10th of each
year money is either expended or it is on hand. Under common everyday usage, the term “expended” means paid
out. This definition is also
consistent with usage in State government.
Under the plain meaning of the law, money on hand in excess of
$350,000 must be remitted to the State Treasury in the time frame set forth
in Section 10. The auditors do not
believe the statute allows the Commission to hold for an indefinite period of
time an unlimited accumulation of money that has been “set aside” or “
pledged as collateral” or “committed” but not paid out. OTHER FINDINGS Other findings dealt with inadequate review of outstanding accounts, inadequate controls over personnel and payroll, property, and equipment, fiscal control and internal auditing, and inaccurate reporting of receipts and disbursements. We will review the Commission’s progress toward implementation of all our recommendations in our next audit. AUDITORS' OPINION Our auditors stated that the
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the respective
financial position of the Commission, as of June 30, 2007, and the respective
changes in net assets and cash flows, thereof for the year then ended. ___________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:KMC:drh SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS
Our special assistant auditors for this audit were E. C. Ortiz & Co., LLP.
|
DIGEST FOOTNOTES
#1 – INACCURATE AND UNTIMELY
SUBMISSION OF GAAP REPORTING PACKAGE –Previous Agency Response
2006: The Commission agrees with the
recommendation and will report activities related to the $40 million in revenue
bonds in an enterprise fund in future fiscal years.
#2 – NONCOMPLIANCE WITH REQUIRED CONTRACTING PROCEDURES – Previous
Agency Response
2006: The Commission has implemented procedures to
improve internal controls to ensure all procurements are in accordance with
State statutes, the inclusion of all certifications and clauses in contracts,
and the filing of contracts with the State Comptroller’s Office. The Commission has made changes to staff,
including replacement of the CFO, in part to correct these oversights.
Certain of these purchases and maintenance fees were
expended under emergency conditions for critical attention to the Commission’s
computer network infrastructure, security and data backup. The IMD was unaware of the procedural
requirements of the Emergency Purchases Act and will begin to implement the
necessary procedures to ensure
compliance.
#3 – FAILURE TO REMIT UNEXPENDED PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF COMMISSION
PROPERTY INTO THE INCOME FUND HELD IN THE STATE TREASURY – Previous Agency
Responses
2006: The Commission disagrees with the finding. The Commission has received a legal opinion
contrary to the opinion of the Auditor General. The Commission has sought clarification from the Attorney
General’s Office.