REPORT DIGEST NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT (In accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133) For the Year Ended: Summary of Findings: Total this audit 3 Release Date: State of Illinois WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: (217)782-6046 or TDD (217) 524-4646 This Report Digest is also available on |
SYNOPSIS
{Financial Information is summarized on the reverse page.} |
NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT
For The Year Ended June 30, 2001
FINANCIAL OPERATIONS (CURRENT FUNDS) | FY 2001 |
FY 2000 |
|
REVENUES State Appropriations General Revenue Fund Education Assistance Fund Capital Development Fund Payments on behalf of University Student tuition and other fees Grants (principally federal awards) Student Union sales and services Parking revenue Illinois Future Fund Other sources Total EXPENDITURES AND MANDATORY TRANSFERS Total |
$31,454,819 |
$29,275,289 $89,514,560 |
|
SELECTED ACCOUNT BALANCES (ALL FUNDS) | JUNE 30, 2001 |
JUNE 30, 2000 |
|
Cash and short-term investments Equipment Buildings and Land Accrued compensated absences Fund balances (deficit): Unrestricted Restricted |
$21,052,850 43,355,323 91,842,851 11,865,943 $134,343,479 5,421,234 |
$17,666,966 43,071,021 88,320,741 13,061,443 $124,480,788 5,455,148 |
|
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION | FY 2001 |
FY 2000 |
|
Employment Statistics Administration Faculty Civil Service Students Total Employees Selected Activity Measures |
1,467
|
1,436
|
|
UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT | |||
During Audit Period: Dr. Salme H.
Steinberg Currently: Dr. Salme H. Steinberg |
Questionable unemployment benefit claims and payments paid to State employees
Subgrantee audit reports not received by the University as required
|
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS LACK OF CONTROLS IN MONITORING UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION The University failed to develop adequate controls over the review of unemployment benefit claims and payments. This resulted in questionable benefits being paid by the State to employees who were still receiving a paycheck from the University. In our follow-up testing from the prior year audit, we sampled 15 University employees who received $39,363 in unemployment benefits. In 20 percent (3 of 15) of the cases sampled, we questioned the appropriateness of $1,586 paid out in unemployment benefits. Two questionable cases were for employees receiving a paycheck and unemployment check simultaneously. In one case, a student received unemployment but the University was unable to find any unemployment claim information. (Finding 2, pages 18-19) This finding has been repeated since 1999. We recommended the University further develop its policies and procedures for the review of unemployment benefit activity by instituting a control whereby the individual that processes unemployment activity could verify and protest cases where benefit recipients were simultaneously working and receiving unemployment. Further, the University should maintain all necessary documentation regarding unemployment claims. University officials responded they have further developed their policies and procedures for review of unemployment benefit activity by instituting an additional control. (For previous University responses, see Digest footnote 1.) FAILURE TO FULLY MONITOR SUBGRANTEES The University has a five year $31.3 million dollar Federal grant for the Gear-Up program to provide or guarantee low-income students financial assistance to attend an institution of higher education. For fiscal year 2001, total expenditures for this program were $5,912,638. During fiscal year 2000, the University passed through $732,829 of funds received to six subgrantees. The subgrantees were paid on a reimbursement basis from quarterly progress and expenditure reports received from them and reviewed by the University. The grant agreement required the subgrantee to provide the University with a current certified audit report no later than six months after the subgrantees fiscal year (by December 31, 2000). Prior to our inquiries, the University had received no reports for the fiscal year 2000 subgrants and had done no follow-up. After our inquiry, the University requested and received 3 of 6 (50%) of the required audit reports before the end of our fieldwork. Federal regulations require pass through entities to properly monitor subgrantees to ensure that subrecipients have complied with audit requirements. (Finding 1, pages 16-17) We recommended the University develop procedures to properly monitor and administer subgrants. University officials agreed with our recommendation and stated they will implement the procedures necessary for compliance, as well as actions to take for noncompliance. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining finding and recommendation is less significant and is reportedly being given attention by University management. We will review progress toward implementation of our recommendations in our next audit. University responses were provided by Mark Wilcockson, Vice President for Finance and Administration.
AUDITORS' OPINION Our auditors stated the Universitys financial statements at June 30, 2001 and for the year then ended are fairly presented in all material respects.
___________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:ROQ:ak SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors for this audit were Nykiel, Carlin & Co. DIGEST FOOTNOTES #1 LACK OF CONTROLS IN MONITORING UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 2000: "The University concurs with the recommendation and will further develop and improve its policies and procedures for the review of unemployment benefit activity. In particular, as recommended by the Office of the Auditor General, the University will assign the responsibility of monitoring and protesting, if applicable, unemployment claims to a specific unit within the Personnel Department and secure the necessary training to fulfill their responsibilities." 1999: "The University is in the process of developing formal policies and procedures for the review of unemployment benefit activity that includes protesting all cases of potential ineligibility so that State resources are adequately protected. In addition, the University is consulting with legal counsel to ensure that citizens rights are not jeopardized, thereby, placing the University at risk." |