REPORT DIGEST POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2004 Summary of Findings:
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest is also
available on the worldwide web at http://www.state.il.us/auditor |
SYNOPSIS
·
The Board made payments for
efficiency initiative billings from improper line item appropriations and
funds.
{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.} |
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2004
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2004 |
FY 2003 |
FY 2002 |
|
||
· Total Expenditures (All Funds)
Personal Services..................... % of Total Expenditures........ Average No. of Employees....
Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement).............................. % of Total Expenditures.......
Case Management.................... % of Total Expenditures....... Contractual Services................. % of Total Expenditures........ All Other Items......................... % of Total Expenditures........
·
Cost of Property and Equipment.. |
$2,505,820 $1,154,162 46.06% 28 $440,868 17.59% $694,522 27.72% $39,448 1.57% $176,820 7.06% $913,475 |
$2,877,734 $1,651,177 57.38% 30 $516,845 17.96% $590,090 20.51% $13,085 .45% $106,537 3.70% $969,250 |
$3,207,629 $1,786,981 55.71% 39 $552,466 17.22% $723,608 22.56% $21,039 .66% $123,535 3.85% $1,004,777 |
|
||
SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES |
FY 2004 |
FY 2003 |
FY 2002 |
|
||
· Cases Handled by Board · Regulations Proposed · Total Cash Receipts (All Funds) |
317 26 $716,263 |
271 22 $740,535 |
289 22 $741,485 |
|
||
|
|
|
||||
AGENCY DIRECTOR |
During Audit Period: Claire Manning (7/1/02 - 12/31/02), Thomas Johnson (1/1/03 - 11/30/03), J. Philip Novak (12/1/03 - 6/30/04) Currently: J. Philip Novak |
Board did not receive guidance or documentation with
the billings from CMS Efficiency initiative payments totaled $70,662 |
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PAYMENTS WERE MADE FOR
EFFICIENCY INITIATIVE BILLINGS FROM IMPROPER LINE ITEM APPROPRIATIONS AND
FUNDS The Board made payments for efficiency initiative billings from improper line item appropriations and funds. Public Act 93-0025, in part, outlines a program for efficiency initiatives to reorganize, restructure, and reengineer the business processes of the State. The State Finance Act details that the amount designated as savings from efficiency initiatives implemented by the Department of Central Management Services (CMS) shall be paid into the Efficiency Initiatives Revolving Fund. The Act further requires State agencies to pay these amounts from line item appropriations where cost savings are anticipated to occur. The Board did not receive guidance or documentation with the billings from CMS detailing from which line item appropriations savings were anticipated to occur. Board staff reported that the Board has not experienced any savings from these payments. The only guidance received was the amount of payments that should be taken from General Revenue Funds versus other funds for the September 2003 billings. However, the Board, which received no General Revenue Fund appropriations in FY 04, had to make the payments from other funds. The Board made payments for billings not from line item appropriations where the cost savings were anticipated to have occurred but from the line items that could afford the payments. The Board used: • $23,000 from the Environmental Protection Permit and Inspection Fund when State law provides that monies in the fund shall be appropriated "for manifest, permit, and inspection activities and for processing requests." • $22,162 from the Used Tire Management Fund when State law provides that of the allocation of monies from the fund, "2% shall be available to the Pollution Control Board for administration of its activities relating to used and waste tires." The Board paid a total of $70,662 for the efficiency initiative from four separate funds. (Finding 1, pages 9-11) We recommended the Board only make payments for efficiency initiative billings from line item appropriations where savings would be anticipated to occur. Further, the Board should seek an explanation from the Department of Central Management Services as to how savings levels were calculated, or otherwise arrived at, and how savings achieved or anticipated impact the Board's budget. Board officials accepted our finding and recommendation and stated they will make savings payments from appropriations for which it anticipates obtaining savings. Further, CMS will provide information to the Board on the method by which savings estimates were derived. Kathryn Griffin, Fiscal Officer, provided the response to our finding and recommendation. AUDITORS'
OPINION
We conducted a compliance examination of the Board as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. We have not audited any financial statements of the Board for the purpose of expressing an opinion because the Board does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial statements. ___________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:KMA:pp SPECIAL
ASSISTANT AUDITORS
Our special assistant auditors for this engagement were Kyle E. McGinnis, CPA.
|
|
|