REPORT DIGEST
REGIONAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION #9
CHAMPAIGN AND FORD COUNTIES
FINANCIAL AUDIT (In Accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133)
For the Year Ended: June 30, 2010
Summary of Findings:
Total this audit: 2
Total last audit: 2
Repeated from last audit: 1
Release Date: April 14, 2011
State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a copy of the Report contact:
Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703
(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887
This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov
____________________________
SYNOPSIS
• The Regional Office of Education #9 did not have
sufficient internal controls over the financial reporting process.
• The Regional Office of Education #9 did not have adequate
controls over property records.
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION
The Regional Office of Education #9 is required to maintain
a system of controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). ROE #9’s internal controls over GAAP
financial reporting should include adequately trained personnel with the
knowledge and expertise to prepare and/or thoroughly review GAAP based
financial statements to ensure that they are free of material misstatements and
include all disclosures as required by the Governmental Accounting Standards
Board (GASB).
The Regional Office of Education #9 did not have sufficient
internal controls over the financial reporting process. The Regional Office maintains its accounting
records on the cash basis of accounting.
While ROE #9 maintains controls over the processing of most accounting
transactions, there were not sufficient controls over the preparation of the
GAAP based financial statements for management or employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions to prevent or detect financial
statement misstatements and disclosure omissions in a timely manner.
• The ROE did not have adequate controls over the maintenance of complete records of accounts receivable, accounts payable, or deferred revenue. While the ROE maintained records to indicate the balances of accounts receivable, accounts payable, and deferred revenues, not all entries were made by the ROE to reconcile their grant activity, such as posting grants receivable and deferred revenue.
• The ROE’s financial information required numerous
adjusting entries to present the financial statements in accordance with
GAAP. These included multiple adjusting
entries from the prior year’s audit that were not recorded in the general
ledger. The ROE reviews, approves, and
accepts the responsibility for these audit adjustments.
According to ROE #9 management, they did not have adequate
funding to hire and/or train their accounting personnel in order to comply with
GASB requirements. (Finding 10-1, pages
12-13) This finding was first reported
in 2007.
The auditors recommended that, as part of its internal control
over the preparation of its financial statements, including disclosures, the
Regional Office of Education #9 should implement a comprehensive preparation
and/or review procedure to ensure that the financial statements, including
disclosures, are complete and accurate.
These procedures should be performed by a properly trained individual(s)
possessing a thorough understanding of the applicable generally accepted
accounting principles, GASB pronouncements, and knowledge of the ROE #9’s
activities and operations.
The Regional Office of Education #9 responded that it
understands the nature of this finding and realizes that this circumstance is
not unusual in an organization of this size.
The ROE noted that it has worked to alleviate this finding by consulting
about accounting practices and preparation of GAAP-based financial statements
with other ROE bookkeepers who have not received the finding and making changes
to its procedures based on recommendations.
The ROE #9 noted that as part of on-going efforts, it will continue to
strive to improve controls over financial statement preparation. The ROE noted that beginning in FY 2011, a
worksheet will be used to facilitate the preparation of financial statements
that would meet the GASB requirements.
(For previous Regional Office response, see Digest Footnote #1.)
CONTROLS OVER PROPERTY RECORDS
The Champaign/Ford Counties Regional Office of Education #9
did not have adequate controls over property records. The Illinois Administrative Code (74 Ill.
Adm. Code 420.320 (c) (1) and (2)) requires that each Regional Office of
Education maintain the accounting records necessary to prepare financial
statements in accordance with GAAP. In
addition, Appendix B. Fixed Asset Accounting of the Illinois Program Accounting
Manual (IPAM) and GAAP also require that capital assets be reported based on
the invoiced cost plus any applicable ancillary charges necessary to make the
capital asset ready for its intended use.
Ancillary charges are costs that are directly related to asset
acquisition, which include, among others, installation and freight charges.
In addition, the State and Federal Grant Administration
Policy and Fiscal Requirements and Procedures issued by the Illinois State
Board of Education dictates procedures for managing equipment acquired with
State and/or federal funds. These
include procedures to ensure, among others that (1) adequate records are
maintained for all equipment, and (2) disposition or transfers are authorized
in writing and that the transfers are recorded in the fixed assets inventory
records.
The Regional Office did not have adequate controls over
property records. Auditors noted the
following:
• The Regional Office did not properly record certain
capital asset acquisitions. Computer equipment
totaling $81,073 was erroneously recorded as supplies, instead of capital
expenditures. This consisted of 112
netbooks with net acquisition cost of $724 per unit. Acquisition cost per netbook includes $387
invoice cost, plus $337 for installation of operating system, application
software, and shipping cost.
• Proper equipment transfer forms were not used to document
transfer of 7 netbooks totaling $5,068 to another agency.
• Fixed asset inventory records were not updated to record
13 netbooks totaling $9,412.
Failure to update property records resulted in inaccurate
and incomplete property records. It
could also result in incorrect accounting information and inaccurate financial
reporting.
According to ROE #9 management, the cost of computer
equipment which included installation cost and freight charges were erroneously
recorded as supplies instead of capital assets because only the basic unit cost
of the computer equipment, which is below the capital asset capitalization
threshold, was initially considered as acquisition cost. Consequently, the 13 netbooks were not
included in the fixed asset listing. The
transfer of 7 netbook computers to another agency, which was not properly
documented on equipment transfer forms, was due to oversight. (Finding 10-2,
pages 14-15)
Auditors recommended that the Regional Office establish
procedures to ensure capital asset acquisitions are properly accounted for and
recorded in accordance with GAAP, the Illinois Administrative Code, IPAM and
the ROE Accounting Manual. To establish
accountability, transfers of equipment should be properly supported by signed
check-out or equipment transfer forms.
Further, the fixed asset inventory records should be updated promptly to
reflect accurate balances.
The Regional Office responded that based on suggestions from
a previous auditor, it used the base cost of equipment in determining whether
or not an item was a capital expenditure.
The ROE notes that in this case, the acquisition cost of each netbook
was $387, and ROE #9 determined that it was below the $500 standard and thus
recorded it in supplies. The Regional
Office noted that in the future, it will use the acquisition cost plus any
ancillary charges necessary to make the capital asset ready for its intended
use including installation and shipping charges, as the basis for determining
whether an item is a capital expenditure.
AUDITORS’ OPINION
Our auditors state the Regional Office of Education #9’s
financial statements as of June 30, 2010 are fairly presented in all material
respects.
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND
Auditor General
WGH:KJM
AUDITORS ASSIGNED:
E.C. Ortiz & Co., LLP, Certified Public Accountants were our special
assistant auditors.
DIGEST FOOTNOTES
#1: Controls Over Financial Statement Preparation —Previous
Regional Office Response
In its prior response in 2009, the Regional Office of
Education #9 responded that it accepts the degree of risk associated with the
condition because the additional expense to seek outside accounting expertise to
prepare and/or review financial statements would take away from the funds
available to provide educational services for the schools in the region. The Regional Office noted that it will
continue to review, approve, and accept responsibility for the audit
adjustments, financial statements and related notes provided by the
auditors.