REPORT DIGEST JUDGES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION For the Year Ended: June 30, 2013 Release Date: March 20, 2014 Summary of Findings: • Compliance Examination: 1 • Financial Audit (previously reported 1-8-14): 0 Total findings: 1 Total last report: 1 Repeated from last audit: 0 State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov SYNOPSIS This digest covers our compliance examination of the Judges’ Retirement System (System) for the year ended June 30, 2013. A financial audit covering the year ending June 30, 2013 was previously released on January 8, 2014. In total this report contains one finding, which was not previously reported in the Financial Audit. • The System lacked an adequate project management framework, and the development process over computer system projects was not properly controlled and documented. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS NEED TO IMPROVE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVER THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS The Judges’ Retirement System (System) did not have an adequate project management framework, and had not ensured the development process over computer system projects was properly controlled and documented. During our examination we noted that there were problems with the Modernization - Re-Engineering Project. The project has been ongoing for five years, is only 20% complete, and over $2,000,000 has been expended by the State Retirement Systems collectively. Due to staffing issues and the lack of a project management framework and the associated documentation, the project has not been fully implemented. In addition, formal documentation to provide detailed information on the current status and projected completion date is lacking. We also found that the generally accepted practices and steps associated with an effective system development methodology were not instituted. System management stated a lack of adequate staffing led to the delays in the re- engineering project. (Finding 1, pages 10-11) We recommended the System: • Develop and implement a project management framework and tools to ensure projects are adequately monitored and documented. • Ensure all required documentation is developed, reviewed, and approved by the System prior to system implementation. • Ensure all system and user testing is properly conducted, reviewed, approved and documented prior to system implementation. • Ensure all changes are adequately reviewed, tested, approved and documented prior to system implementation. System officials agreed with our recommendation and indicated that a project management framework, application development methodologies, and change management controls have since been implemented to address these issues. ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT The auditors conducted a compliance attestation examination of the System for the year ended June 30, 2013 as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. The accountants’ report does not contain any scope limitations, disclaimers or other significant non-standard language. WILLIAM G. HOLLAND Auditor General WGH:JAF SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS Our special assistant auditors for the compliance examination were BKD LLP.