REPORT DIGEST DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FINANCIAL
AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION For the Year Ended: June 30, 2006 Summary of Findings: Repeated from last audit 0 Release Date:
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full
Report is also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS ¨ The Department did not ensure its disaster contingency plans were updated and adequately tested to ensure timely recovery of its critical computer resources.
{Expenditures and Activity
Measures are summarized on the next page.} |
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
EXPENDITURE STATISTICS |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total Expenditures (All Funds)........................................... |
$8,823,611 |
$8,089,177 |
OPERATIONS
TOTAL..........................................................
% of Total Expenditures..................................................... |
$222,180
3% |
$226,299
3% |
Personal Services................................................................
% of
Operations Total Expenditures..................................
Average
Number of Employees........................................ |
$109,410
49%
2,058 |
$109,547
48%
2,124 |
Other Payroll Costs (FICA,
Retirement)...............................
% of
Operations Total Expenditures.................................. |
$25,780
12% |
$34,007
15% |
Contractual Services...........................................................
% of
Operations Total Expenditures.................................. |
$42,883
19% |
$37,783
17% |
All Other Operations Items..................................................
% of
Operations Total Expenditures................. |
$44,107
20% |
$44,962
20% |
|
|
|
AWARDS
& GRANTS, REFUNDS TOTAL..........................
% of Total Expenditures..................................................... |
$4,511,817
51% |
$3,964,338
49% |
NON-APPROPRIATED
FUNDS...........................................
% of Total Expenditures..................................................... |
$4,089,614
46% |
$3,898,540
48% |
Total Deposits Remitted to the State Treasury |
$30,567,310 |
$28,547,732 |
Income Taxes.........................................................................
% of Total Revenues......................................................... |
$12,612,492
41% |
$11,521,783
40% |
Sales Taxes.............................................................................
% of Total Revenues......................................................... |
$11,456,367
37% |
$10,631,440
37% |
Motor Fuel
Taxes....................................................................
% of Total Revenues......................................................... |
$1,373,236
5% |
$1,360,349
5% |
Public
Utilities Taxes...............................................................
% of Total Revenues......................................................... |
$1,758,633
6% |
$1,729,792
6% |
Other
Collections.....................................................................
% of Total Revenues.......................................................... |
$3,366,582
11% |
$3,304,368
12% |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT at June 30, |
$27,544 |
$27,804 |
SELECTED ACCOUNT BALANCES at June 30,
Taxes
Receivable.................................................................. Allowance for Uncollectible Taxes......................................... Net Taxes Receivable........................................................ |
$1,935,446
(634,498)
$1,300,948 |
$2,014,435
(645,062)
$1,369,373 |
DEPARTMENT
DIRECTOR
During Audit Period: Brian A. Hamer
Currently: Brian A. Hamer |
Contingency plans were
not tested and updated during the audit period |
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, ANDRECOMMENDATIONS INADEQUATE DISASTER CONTINGENCY PLANNING
The Department did not
ensure its disaster contingency plans were updated and adequately tested to
ensure timely recovery of its critical computer resources. During our review of the Department’s 24
contingency plans we noted:
·
The contingency plans had not been updated or tested during the audit
period. Eleven plans were last
updated in 2002; four in 2003; and eight in 2004. The last recovery test was
performed in March 2005.
·
Not all plans included a prioritized list of critical applications and
recovery timeframes;
·
Most plans did not identify recovery personnel and contact information
or the contact information was not updated;
·
Several plans included incorrect information pertaining to an
alternative hot-site location. (Finding 2, pages 12-13) We recommended the Department update its
contingency plans to reflect the current environment and include a
prioritized listing of critical applications, recovery timeframes, and
current recovery team members. Once updated the Department should ensure the
plans are updated and adequately tested at least annually to ensure the plans
remain current and effective. In addition, testing should be documented and
the plans updated if necessary.
The Department agreed with the finding and recommendation and will
ensure the plans are updated and adequately tested to ensure the plans remain
current and effective. OTHER
FINDING
The remaining finding is reportedly being given attention by the
Department. We will review the
Department’s progress towards implementing our recommendation during the next
audit period. AUDITORS’ OPINION Our
auditors stated the financial statements of the Department of Revenue as of
June 30, 2006, and for the year then ended are fairly presented in all
material respects. ____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor
General WGH:GR:pp SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS
Our special assistant auditors on this audit were McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. |