REPORT DIGEST SUPREME COURT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 Release Date: Aug. 4, 2022 FINDINGS THIS AUDIT: 2 CATEGORY: NEW -- REPEAT – TOTAL Category 1: 0 -- 0 -- 0 Category 2: 1 -- 1 -- 2 Category 3: 0 -- 0 -- 0 TOTAL: 1 -- 1 -- 2 FINDINGS LAST AUDIT: 1 Category 1: Findings that are material weaknesses in internal control and/or a qualification on compliance with State laws and regulations (material noncompliance). Category 2: Findings that are significant deficiencies in internal control and noncompliance with State laws and regulations. Category 3: Findings that have no internal control issues but are in noncompliance with State laws and regulations. State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General FRANK J. MAUTINO, AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov SYNOPSIS • (21-01) The Supreme Court Historic Preservation Commission (Commission) did not maintain adequate controls over its receipt processing procedures and related fiscal records. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER REVENUES The Commission did not maintain adequate controls over its receipt processing procedures and related fiscal records. During testing, we noted the following: • The Commission did not maintain an adequate segregation of duties over its receipt processing functions. More specifically, we noted that one employee had the authority to perform all parts of the transaction cycle, including: – Authorization by reviewing and approving transactions, including both depositing funds into the State Treasury’s clearing accounts and preparing Receipt Deposit Transmittal (C-64) forms. – nic and physical records. – Recordkeeping by preparing entries and maintaining the Commission’s internal accounting records. – Reconciliation by preparing reconciliations with the Office of Comptroller’s (Comptroller) records to verify each transaction’s validity, proper authorization, and entry into the Commission’s accounting records. • The Commission filed a copy of its Fiscal Year 2021 Agency Fee Imposition Report 45 days late. Although the Commission does not impose fees, it is still required to file a negative report with the Comptroller indicating it did not collect fees during the applicable fiscal year. (Finding 1, pages 8-9) We recommended the Commission timely file its Agency Fee Imposition Reports as required by the SAMS Manual. Furthermore, we recommended the Commission provide for and document an adequate separation of duties over its receipt processes. The Commission agreed with the recommendation. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining finding pertain to the Commission not implementing adequate controls related to cybersecurity, programs, and control of confidential information. We will review the Commission’s progress towards the implementation of our recommendations in our next State compliance examination. ACCOUNTANT’S OPINION The accountants conducted a State compliance examination of the Commission for the two years ended June 30, 2021, as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. The accountants stated the Commission complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described in the report. This State compliance examination was conducted by the Office of the Auditor General’s staff. JANE CLARK Division Director This report is transmitted in accordance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. FRANK J. MAUTINO Auditor General FJM:SW