REPORT DIGEST SUPREME COURT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Release Date: July 14, 2026 FINDINGS THIS AUDIT: 2 CATEGORY: NEW -- REPEAT – TOTAL Category 1: 0 -- 1 -- 1 Category 2: 0 -- 1 -- 1 Category 3: 0 -- 0 -- 0 TOTAL: 0 -- 2 -- 2 FINDINGS LAST AUDIT: 2 State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General CHRISTOPHER B. MEISTER, AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office of the Auditor General, 400 West Monroe, Suite 306, Springfield, IL 62704-9849 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov SYNOPSIS • (25-1) The Supreme Court Historic Preservation Commission (Commission) did not maintain adequate controls over personal services. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER PERSONAL SERVICES The Supreme Court Historic Preservation Commission (Commission) did not maintain adequate controls over personal services. During the testing of employees, we noted the Commission did not maintain adequate control or have formal policies in place over personnel records and payroll to minimize the risk of payroll errors through miscommunication and/or lack of documentation, as described below: • For 3 of 3 (100%) employees tested, the Commission did not maintain personnel files with adequate documentation regarding salary. Specifically, the files lacked documentation for salary adjustments as well as lacked several required documents needed to perform testing related to gross pay, pension contributions, pay grades, or pay steps. • For 1 of 1 (100%) part-time employees tested, the Commission was unable to provide documentation of time worked; therefore, we were unable to determine whether the employee should have been awarded personal, sick, or vacation time. • For 2 of 3 (67%) employees tested, the Commission did not compute accrued balances of leave time in accordance with the Commission's policies. • For 2 of 3 (67%) employees tested, vacation leave time was not pre-approved according to policy. Leave was approved between 2 and 5 days late. While performing recalculations of payroll, we noted the following: • For 3 of 3 (100%) employees tested, the Commission did not compute employee payroll deductions correctly based on employee payroll documentation. We noted errors in the amount withheld for State and Federal Taxes. • For 1 of 3 (33%) employees tested, the Commission did not maintain the State W-4 Employee's Withholding Certificate form on file to support the withholding taxes during the period. As a result, we were unable to recalculate the employee’s state withholding taxes. While performing testing of payroll vouchers, we noted the following: • For 2 of 10 (20%) payroll vouchers tested, totaling $44,062, no approval signature or date was documented on the voucher; therefore, we could not determine if the voucher was properly approved and processed. • For 1 of 10 (10%) payroll vouchers tested, totaling $1,464, we were unable to trace the voucher to the Commission’s expenditure records. While performing testing of Agency Workforce Reports, we noted the following: • The Commission did not submit its Fiscal Year 2023 (filed in FY24) and Fiscal Year 2024 (filed in FY25) Agency Workforce Reports with the Office of the Secretary of State. • The Commission’s Fiscal Year 2023 Report contained five instances and the Commission’s Fiscal Year 2024 Report contained two instances where the reported amounts and percentages were not calculated accurately. (Finding 1, pages 8-12) We recommended the Commission strengthen its internal controls over personal services to ensure proper documentation and personnel files are maintained correctly and reports are accurately filed. The Commission accepted the recommendation and stated it has begun the process to correct many of these issues by undertaking a major overhaul of the employee manual and implementing procedures in accordance with policies. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining finding pertains to weaknesses in the Commission’s Cybersecurity and the Security and Control of Confidential Information. We will review the Commission’s progress towards the implementation of our recommendations in our next State compliance examination. ACCOUNTANT’S OPINION The accountants conducted a State compliance examination of the Commission for the two years ended June 30, 2025, as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. The accountants qualified their report on State compliance for Finding 2025-001. Except for the noncompliance described in this finding, the accountants stated the Commission complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described in the report. This State compliance examination was conducted by the Office of the Auditor General’s staff. COURTNEY DZIERWA Deputy Auditor General This report is transmitted in accordance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. CHRISTOPHER B. MEISTER Auditor General CBM:mls