REPORT DIGEST SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT (In accordance with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133) For the Year Ended: Summary of Findings: Total this audit 9 Total last audit 12 Repeated from last audit 3 Release Date: State of Illinois WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: (217)782-6046 or TDD (217) 524-4646 This Report Digest is also available on |
SYNOPSIS
{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.} |
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
FINANCIAL OPERATIONS (CURRENT FUNDS) | FY 1999 |
FY 1998 |
|
REVENUES State Appropriations Total EXPENDITURES AND MANDATORY TRANSFERS Instruction Total |
$209,152,818 $548,468,164
$186,734,025 $564,523,210 |
$199,501,451 $531,602,999
$181,576,926 $536,392,937 |
|
SELECTED ACCOUNT BALANCES (ALL FUNDS) | AT JUNE 30, |
AT JUNE 30, |
|
Cash
and Investments Campus Plant Facilities Accrued Compensated Absences Revenue Bonds Payable |
$138,327,401 |
$122,034,948 |
|
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION | FY 1999 |
FY 1998 |
|
Employees (Fall
Term) Carbondale Total Employees Students (Full-time Equivalent) (Fall Term) Carbondale Total Students Instruction Costs Per Full-time Equivalent Student Carbondale |
6,499 9,006
18,688 27,519 $6,785
|
6,822 9,255
18,583 26,987 $6,728
|
|
UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT | |||
During Audit
Period: Dr. Ted Sanders (through January 31, 2000) Currently: Frank E. Horton, Interim President (effective February 1, 2000) |
Problems in reviewing unemployment benefit claims
Travel regulations not followed |
INTRODUCTION Our 1999 audit of Southern Illinois University is presented in three volumes: Compliance Audit; Financial Audits; and Supplementary Financial Information. The findings and recommendations are contained in the Compliance Audit volume. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS LACK OF CONTROLS IN MONITORING UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION The University's failure to develop adequate controls over the review of unemployment benefit claims and payments has resulted in several problems. During FY 99, 164 former/current employees of the University received almost $532,000 in unemployment benefits. To test controls over unemployment benefit processing we selected a sample of 75 of the 164 benefit recipients from Edwardsville and Carbondale. We tested for documentation support for the unemployment benefits paid, as well as the appropriateness of the benefit payments.
We recommended the University develop policies and procedures for the review of unemployment benefit claims and charges that include protesting all cases where potential ineligibility exists so that State resources are adequately protected. University officials responded that they accepted our recommendation and stated they will review University procedures for processing unemployment claims. REIMBURSEMENT OF NON-ALLOWABLE TRAVEL EXPENSES The University reimbursed an employee for travel expenses that were incurred during the employee's commute from his residence to his designated headquarters without submitting an exception report. This employee's permanent home is in St. Louis, Missouri, and his headquarters for travel purposes is the Carbondale campus. The employee's secondary duty station is the Edwardsville campus. When this employee was required to work at the Edwardsville campus, he claimed and received reimbursement for mileage between his designated headquarters, Carbondale, and his home in St. Louis. These payments were approximately $4,500. The Travel Guide for SIU Employees states that "As a condition of employment, employees expect to incur commuting expenses between their residence and headquarters. These expenses are not reimbursable." The University failed to complete an Exception Report for this travel, which must be completed and submitted to the Higher Education Travel Control Board. (Finding 4, page 27) We recommended the University follow its policy of not reimbursing employees for their normal commuting expenses or clarify its policy in regard to this type of situation. University official responded that they accepted our recommendation and stated the University does not and will not reimburse employees for their normal commuting expenses. The officials stated further their belief that the University saved approximately $2,900 in travel costs related to the employees travel. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining findings are less significant and are being given attention by the University. We will review the Universitys progress towards the implementation of our recommendations in our next compliance audit. Mr. Ron Cremeens, Executive Director of Audits, provided the Universitys responses. AUDITORS OPINION Our auditors state the financial statements of the University as of June 30, 1999 and for the year then ended are fairly presented in all material respects.
____________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:KMM:pp SPECIAL ASSISTANT AUDITORS PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were our special assistant auditors for these audits. |