REPORT DIGEST
WESTERN ILLINOIS
UNIVERSITY
FINANCIAL AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION (In accordance with the
For the Year Ended
June 30, 2006 Summary of Findings: Total
this audit 5 Total
last audit 3 Repeated
from last audit 2 Release Date: May 8, 2007
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor
General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the
Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and the
Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov |
SYNOPSIS
· All employees were not required to submit time sheets to document the time spent on official State business as required by the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act. · The University failed to ensure adequate security over its computer systems and resources. {Financial Information is summarized on the reverse page.} |
WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
FINANCIAL AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION
For the Year Ended June 30, 2006
FINANCIAL
OPERATIONS |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
|
OPERATING REVENUES
Tuition and fees, net..........................................................
Auxiliary enterprises, net...................................................
Grants and contracts..........................................................
Other.....................................................................................
Total Operating Revenues........................................
OPERATING EXPENSES
Instruction...........................................................................
Research...............................................................................
Public service......................................................................
Academic support..............................................................
Student services.................................................................
Institutional support..........................................................
Operation and maintenance of plant................................
Student aid...........................................................................
Auxiliary enterprises..........................................................
Depreciation........................................................................
On-behalf payments...........................................................
Other.....................................................................................
Total Operating Expenses.........................................
Operating
Income (Loss)...........................................................
NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)
State appropriations...........................................................
Capital appropriations........................................................
Gifts.......................................................................................
Interest on capital assets - related
debt..........................
Investment income.............................................................
Other net..............................................................................
INCREASE IN NET ASSETS...................................................
Net
assets, beginning of year...................................................
Net
assets, end of year.............................................................. |
$56,901,766
48,131,654
20,043,910
7,244,230
$132,321,560
$50,065,412
4,199,667
10,211,092
16,251,212
17,518,386
11,215,194
13,609,700
5,297,383
41,334,877
9,926,247
27,624,162
5,441,032
$212,694,364
$(80,372,804)
$84,025,247
3,152,373
696,200
(2,359,443)
2,420,131
(122,109)
$7,439,595
$97,476,795
$104,916,390 |
$51,075,172
45,848,730
20,928,925
7,817,875
$125,670,702
$51,059,319
4,565,146
10,303,513
12,894,622
15,254,938
9,572,886
12,702,001
5,297,863
38,970,579
9,763,734
29,966,687
5,492,584
$205,843,872
$(80,173,170)
$86,359,787
346,136
607,893
(2,391,788)
1,033,515
2,456
$5,784,829
$91,691,966
$97,476,795 |
|
SELECTED ACCOUNT BALANCES |
June 30, 2006 |
June 30, 2005 |
|
Cash
and Investments...............................................................
Capital
Assets, net of accumulated depreciation..................
Accrued
Compensated Absences...........................................
Revenue
Bonds Payable............................................................ |
$60,199,562
$128,156,579
$16,782,325
$49,512,640 |
$50,331,945
$128,364,208
$18,034,715
$45,202,845 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (unaudited) |
FY 2006 |
FY 2005 |
|
Employment Statistics |
|
|
|
Faculty and Administrative............................................... |
1,109 |
1,052 |
|
Civil Service......................................................................... |
832 |
822 |
|
Student Employees............................................................. |
303 |
302 |
|
Total Employees......................................................... |
2,244 |
2,176 |
|
Enrollment
Statistics |
|
|
|
Fall term enrollment - undergraduate............................... |
10,930 |
10,752 |
|
Fall term enrollment –graduate......................................... |
1,564 |
1,715 |
|
Fall term enrollment – extension....................................... |
910 |
1,091 |
|
Total.............................................................................. |
13,404 |
13,558 |
|
UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT |
|
|
|
During
Audit Period: Dr. Alvin Goldfarb
Currently: Dr. Alvin Goldfarb |
|
|
|
Negative time reporting is not adequate Security breach occurred
Physical access not adequately restricted |
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
EMPLOYEE TIME SHEETS NOT ADEQUATE The University did not require all employees to periodically submit time sheets as required by the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act. Administrative, professional and faculty employees are required to submit time reports. However, the employee’s time is reported using a negative reporting method. The negative reporting method assumes employees are working their contracted/required hours on official State business unless otherwise reported. The time report lists minimum contracted hours and the employee indicates time away from the office, for vacation, sick or other types of leave. Employees paid on a non-monthly basis were utilizing a positive time reporting system. The Act requires the University adopt personnel policies which require State employees to periodically submit time sheets documenting the time spent each day on official State business to the nearest quarter hour. (Finding 1, page 15) This finding was first reported in 2005. We recommended the University begin requiring monthly employees to submit time sheets in compliance with the Act. University officials concurred with the finding and indicated implementation has been delayed by two factors. First, any additional job related requirements placed on employees subject to collective bargaining agreements have to be negotiated. Also, they are awaiting clarification from the Attorney General on the requirements and implementation of the law. (For the previous University response, see Digest Footnote #1) INADEQUATE COMPUTER SECURITY The University failed to ensure adequate security over its computer systems and resources. During our review, we noted the following: - The University failed to implement solutions to correct security administration and firewall weaknesses identified in the prior audit. In June 2006, the University experienced a security breach which led to the unauthorized access and potential compromise of personal and confidential information, including social security numbers and credit card numbers of anywhere from 200,000 to 240,000 students and alumni. - The University did not ensure that personal, confidential, or sensitive information is adequately disposed when no longer needed. During our review, we noted that approximately 24 disks were maintained in a box on a shelf within a network room. Although access to the network room is restricted, University officials stated the disks were maintained because they did not have the means to properly dispose of the information. It was noted that the disks contained personal and confidential information similar to the data breached. - Access to the University’s Data Center and network wiring closets were not adequately restricted. Access to the Data Center is restricted using a keypad system; however, the access code is shared by everyone having access to the computer room thereby eliminating adequate accountability. - The number of personnel having powerful system-level access privileges was excessive. Without an adequately secured computer environment, the University cannot ensure that access to critical applications, programs and confidential data is appropriately restricted to authorized personnel and the integrity of its computer systems and data is maintained. (Finding 3, pages 18-20) We recommended the University evaluate its computer environment and data maintained to ensure adequate security controls, including physical and logical access restrictions, have been established to safeguard its computer resources. University officials agreed and stated that since the breach, the University has taken measures to strengthen security and address the noted control weaknesses. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining findings are reportedly being given attention by University management. We will review progress toward the implementation of our recommendations in our next examination. AUDITORS'
OPINION Our auditors state the financial statements of Western Illinois University as of June 30, 2006, and for the year then ended, are fairly presented in all material respects. ___________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:KMA:pp SPECIAL
ASSISTANT AUDITORS
BKD, LLP were our special assistant auditors. DIGEST FOOTNOTES
#1: EMPLOYEE TIME SHEETS NOT ADEQUATE – Previous University Response The
University has been addressing this problem by re-writing its personnel/payroll
systems, all of which are automated, to accommodate the requirement that
administrative personnel fill out time cards. Because of the level of automation and integration of our
personnel/payroll systems, these are not changes that could be put into place
within a short period. We anticipate
having the systems completed and ready for testing and implementation during
the Spring of 2006. |