REPORT DIGEST Annual Review
INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THE CTA’S EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT
PLAN
Released: November 2009 State of Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM
G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL
To obtain a
copy of the report contact: Office of
the Auditor General (217)
782-6046 or TTY: (888) 261-2887 This report
is also available on the worldwide web at: http://www.auditor.illinois.gov/ |
SYNOPSIS
The Illinois Pension Code requires
the Retirement Plan to determine the Plan’s funded ratio of assets to
liabilities and determine employee and employer contribution rates needed to
meet the Pension Code’s funding requirements.
The OAG is required to review the Board’s determination and the
assumptions on which it is based and determine whether they are “unreasonable
in the aggregate”. The conclusions reached in this
report are based on the Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2009, prepared
by the Board’s actuary, including its determination of increases in
contribution rates needed for the CTA and its employees to comply with the
funding requirements of the Pension Code.
This Actuarial Valuation was presented to the Retirement Plan Board at
its August 27, 2009 meeting but was not formally acted upon by the Board. Further, as of the conclusion of our
review, no formal action had yet been
taken by the Board to set employee and employer contribution rates to meet
the Pension Code’s funding requirements.
Readers of this report, therefore, are cautioned that this report’s
conclusions are contingent upon the Board's approval of the Actuarial
Valuation and implementation of its recommendations for changes in
contribution rates. The OAG’s review of the Retirement
Plan’s Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2009 concluded its assumptions
were not unreasonable in the aggregate.
However, we do note that the investment return assumption (i.e.,
expected rate of return) of 8.75 percent, while selected using established
standards for pension plans and not unreasonable in the aggregate, is an optimistic assumption and should be
viewed as such. The
Pension Code requires the CTA to contribute 12 percent of pay to the Plan,
less up to a 6 percent credit for debt service paid on the bonds issued in
2008 to fund the Plan; employees are required to pay 6 percent of pay. If the funded ratio is projected to decline
below 60 percent prior to 2040, the CTA is required to pay two-thirds and
employees one-third of the required contribution. The actuary determined that increases in
employer and employee contributions will be necessary in 2010 to meet the 60
percent funding requirement: the
employer contribution rate would need to increase to 10.690 percent (which is
net of the employer debt service credit of 6% per pay); and the employee
contribution rate would need to increase to 8.345 percent. |
REVIEW OF
RETIREMENT PLAN SUBMISSIONS
(1) a
financial balance sheet as of the close of the fiscal year; (2) a
statement of income and expenditures; (3) an
actuarial balance sheet; (4) statistical
data reflecting age, service, and salary characteristics concerning all
participants; (5) special
facts concerning disability or other claims; (6) details
on investment transactions that occurred during the fiscal year covered by
the report; (7) details
on administrative expenses; and (8) such
other supporting data and schedules as in the judgement of the Division may
be necessary for a proper appraisal of the financial condition of the pension
fund and the results of its operations. The annual statement shall also
specify the actuarial and interest tables used in the operation of the
pension fund. Source: Pension
Code ( |
The
The Illinois Pension Code requires the Retirement Plan to determine the
Plan’s funded ratio of assets to liabilities and determine employee and
employer contribution rates needed to meet the Pension Code’s funding
requirements. The OAG is required to
review the Board’s determination and the assumptions on which it is based and
determine whether they are “unreasonable in the aggregate”.
The Retirement Plan submitted to the Auditor General the Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2009, prepared by its actuary. The conclusions reached in this report are based on the Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2009, including its determination of increases in contribution rates for the CTA and its employees to comply with the funding requirements of the Pension Code. This Actuarial Valuation was presented to the Retirement Plan Board at its August 27, 2009 meeting but was not formally acted upon or accepted by the Board. Further, as of the conclusion of our review, no formal action had yet been taken by the CTA Retirement Plan Board to set employee and employer contribution rates to meet funding requirements established by the Pension Code. Readers of this report, therefore, are cautioned that the conclusions reached in this report are contingent upon the Board's approval of the Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2009, and implementation of its recommendations for changes in contribution rates.
The OAG’s review of the Retirement Plan’s Actuarial Valuation as of
January 1, 2009 concluded its assumptions were not unreasonable in the
aggregate.
Investment
Return Assumption
The actuarial valuation has one
assumption that warrants additional discussion.
The Retirement Plan’s actuary wrote that “the current
assumed rate of 8.75 percent falls within the range of reasonable assumptions,” but noted that “this
assumption may be viewed as being very aggressive.”
We concur that the investment return
assumption (i.e., expected rate of return) of 8.75 percent, while selected
using established standards for pension plans and not unreasonable in the
aggregate, is an optimistic
assumption and should be viewed as such.
An 8.75 percent investment return rate is very aggressive, based both on
the data contained in the Retirement Plan’s experience study, as well as with
respect to other government pension plans. In fact, the Retirement Plan’s actuary noted
that an investment return rate of 8.75 percent had only a 27 percent chance of
occurring over the next 30 years. The Retirement
Plan’s actuaries found the median
investment return over 30 years to be 7.63
percent.
Funded Ratio
The
The Pension Code requires the CTA to contribute 12 percent of pay, less
up to a 6 percent credit for debt service paid on the bonds issued in 2008 to
fund the Plan; employees are required to pay 6 percent of pay. The Pension Code further requires that
contribution rates be increased if the funded ratio is projected to decline
below 60 percent prior to 2040, with the CTA paying two-thirds and employees
one-third of the required contribution.
The Actuarial Valuation report concluded that without an increase in
employee and employer contribution rates, the Retirement Plan’s funded ratio
would decline below 60 percent prior to 2040.
The Plan’s actuary determined that the contribution rates would need to
increase beginning in 2010: the employer
contribution rate would need to increase to 10.690 percent (which is net of the
employer debt service credit of 6% per pay); and the employee contribution rate
would need to increase to 8.345 percent.
The January 1, 2009 Actuarial Valuation was presented to the Board at
its August 27, 2009 meeting. As noted
above, the Board did not formally act to enact or approve these increased
rates.
As of January 1, 2009, the actuarial
value of assets for pension benefits was approximately $2 billion and the
actuarial liability was $2.6 billion, according to the Actuarial Valuation by
the Retirement Plan’s actuary.
·
The
funded ratio increased from 37.2
percent as of January 1, 2008 to 75.8 percent as of December 31, 2008, primarily
due to a one-time extraordinary employer contribution of $1.11 billion from the
issue of debt.
·
Investment
losses decreased the funded ratio by
2.4 percent.
·
Changes
due to assumptions decreased the
funded ratio by 1.1 percent.
·
Lowering the investment return assumption
from 8.75 percent to 8.50 percent would
also decrease the funded ratio by
1.8 percent.
WILLIAM G. HOLLAND
Auditor General
WGH:AD
November 2009