REPORT DIGEST DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES BUREAU OF COMMUNICATION
AND COMPUTER SERVICES THIRD PARTY REVIEW For the Year Ended: June 30, 2004 Release Date: July 1, 2004
State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLANDAUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office of the Auditor
General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY 1-888-261-2887 This Report Digest is also
available on the worldwide web at http://www.state.il.us/auditor |
INTRODUCTION
The Department of Central Management Services’ (Department)
Bureau of Communication and Computer Services carries out statutory
responsibilities relating to data processing and telecommunication services (20 ILCS 405/405-10; 20 ILCS 405/405-20; 20
ILCS 405/405-250; 20 ILCS 405/405-255; and 20 ILCS 405/405-260). To fulfill its responsibilities, the Department
operates the Central Computer Facility (CCF), the Communications Center, and
branch facilities in Springfield. A Springfield branch facility also serves
as the primary backup site should a disaster prevent processing at the CCF. Through
its facilities, the Department provides data processing services to
approximately 101 user entities. The CCF functions as a data processing service center,
providing computing and telecommunication resources for State agencies’
use. The Department and the agencies
that use the Department’s computer resources share the responsibility for
maintaining the integrity and security of computerized data and functions. We reviewed data processing general controls at the
Department primarily during the period from December 10, 2003 to May 14,
2004. We performed tests to determine
compliance with policies and procedures, conducted interviews, performed
observations, and identified specific control objectives and procedures we
considered necessary to evaluate the controls. We also reviewed application controls for systems maintained
by the Department for State agencies’ use.
The systems reviewed were the Central Payroll, Central Inventory,
Central Time and Attendance, and Accounting Information Systems. The Department’s control procedures and the degree of
compliance with the procedures were sufficient to provide reasonable, but not
absolute, assurance that relevant control objectives were achieved. To
view an online version of the complete report, go to
http://www.state.il.us/auditor/special.htm |
ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES
BUREAU
OF COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER SERVICES
STATISTICS |
2004 |
||
Mainframes |
4 Units
Configured as 14 Production Systems |
||
Services/Workload
|
40,749 Nodes Statewide
(Terminals, Printers, etc.) 84.5 Million IMS
Transactions per Month 1.4 Million Feet of Laser
Printing per Month 317,369 Reel/Cartridge Tape
Mounts per Month |
||
State
Agency Users |
101 |
||
Bureau
Employees
|
2001
-- 380 2002
-- 387 2003
-- 307 2004
-- 303 |
||
Historical
Growth Trend* |
2001 -- 2002 --
2003 --2004
-- |
1,557 2,040 2,700 3,614 MIPS |
-- MIPS -- MIPS -- MIPS -- MIPS -- Million Instructions Per Second |
|
* In the month of
April for each year listed |
Information
provided by the Department - Unaudited
AGENCY DIRECTOR AND
DEPUTY DIRECTOR/BUREAU MANAGER |
During Audit Period: Director: Michael Rumman Deputy Director/Bureau Manager: Alan
Burgard (7/1/2003 to 12/7/2003), Jay Carlson (12/8/2003) Currently: Director: Michael
Rumman -- Deputy Director/Bureau Manager: Jay Carlson
|
State Government Must Be Prepared |
REPORT
SUMMARY Disaster Contingency Planning
The Department has developed strategies to address
the disaster contingency needs of the State’s Central Computer Facility;
however, the plans and operational provisions need to be enhanced to provide
assurance that all of the State’s critical applications and network
operations can be recovered within required timeframes. The State is placing great reliance on the
Department’s ability to provide data processing and network services in the
event of a disaster. As such, comprehensive and thoroughly tested disaster contingency
plans are an essential component of recovery efforts. The Department should ensure the necessary
components (plans, equipment, and facilities) are available to provide for
continuation of critical computer operations in the event of a disaster. In addition, the Department should conduct
comprehensive tests of the plans on an annual basis. The Department concurred with our recommendation. In addition, the Department stated it
would continue to evaluate and enhance business continuity planning and
preparedness. AUDITORS' OPINION Procedures were generally sufficient to provide
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that relevant general and application
control objectives were achieved.
____________________________________ WILLIAM G.
HOLLAND, Auditor General
WGH:WJS:ap |